- Home
- Hapoel Be'er Sheva vs Maccabi Tel Aviv
Hapoel Be'er Sheva vs Maccabi Tel Aviv 1-4 Score & Prediction Review
Ligat ha'Al - Season 2026/2027 (Round 3)
1–4
On these chances Hapoel Be'er Sheva would usually take 0.2 points and Maccabi Tel Aviv 2.8; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Hapoel Be'er Sheva.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Hapoel Be'er Sheva vs Maccabi Tel Aviv stats: how the match was played
Ligat ha'Al
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Maccabi Tel Aviv had more than twice the shots on target
Hapoel Be'er Sheva
Maccabi Tel Aviv
2
Shots on target
14
1
Big chances
7
4
Corners
5
5
Yellow cards
1
1
Red cards
0
43%
Possession
57%
Hapoel Be'er Sheva vs Maccabi Tel Aviv — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Ligat ha'Al
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Hapoel Be'er Sheva to win
WrongOur track record
In 2,107 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 43.6% of the time (bookmakers said 43.9%).
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
CorrectOur track record
In 2,490 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 62.5% of the time (bookmakers said 61.6%).
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,118 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.5% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
WrongOur track record
In 938 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 60.1% of the time (bookmakers said 60.1%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
WrongOur track record
In 6,717 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.2%).
Our model’s pick
Hapoel Be'er Sheva 0–1 goals
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Hapoel Be'er Sheva 2+ goals.
Our track record
In 1,026 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 43.0% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.1% than to our 55–60%.
Our model’s pick
Maccabi Tel Aviv 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 1,614 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.4% of the time (bookmakers said 61.0%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Hapoel Be'er Sheva vs Maccabi Tel Aviv 1-4 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Hapoel Be'er Sheva vs Maccabi Tel Aviv. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
12 76%
BTTS*
Yes 64%
Correct Score
1-1 10%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 63%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
over 51%
Winner
12 76%
BTTS*
Yes 64%
Correct Score
1-1 10%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 63%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
over 51%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 17% | 83% | 37% | 63% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 49% | 51% | 75% | 25% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 75% | 55% | 45% | |
| 27% | 73% | 55% | 45% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79% | 21% | 92% | 8% | |
| 79% | 21% | 92% | 8% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
24%
2-2
19%
X-X
15%
X-1
14%
X-2
11%
1-X
5%
2-X
5%
1-2
3%
2-1
3%
Correct Score
1-1
10.0%
1-2
8.3%
2-1
8.1%
2-2
6.9%
1-0
6.5%
0-1
5.7%
2-0
5.3%
0-0
4.8%
1-3
4.7%
3-1
4.5%
0-2
4.4%
2-3
3.7%
3-2
3.6%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score