1. Zamalek vs Al Ittihad

Zamalek vs Al Ittihad 0-0 Score & Prediction Review

Premier League - Season 2026/2027 (Round 1)

Fair result
ZamalekZamalek

0–0

Al IttihadAl Ittihad
1.0Chances (xG)1.0

On these chances Zamalek would usually take 1.4 points and Al Ittihad 1.3; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: Zamalek.

Zamalek −0.4 pts vs chancesAl Ittihad −0.3 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Zamalek vs Al Ittihad stats: how the match was played

Premier League

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Al Ittihad had clearly more shots on target

Zamalek

Al Ittihad

2

Shots on target

3

1

Big chances

0

7

Corners

5

1

Yellow cards

1

61%

Possession

40%

The match between Zamalek and Al Ittihad ended 0-0. Our AI model predicted a Zamalek win at 46% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Overall a solid read on this match, with 3 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Both Teams To Score, Over/Under 2.5 Goals & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Asyut Petrol – Zamalek prediction & betting tips (Oct 20, 2026).

Zamalek vs Al Ittihad — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Premier League

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Zamalek to win

Wrong
Our model 47%Bookmakers 67%

Our track record

In 3,513 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 49.3% of the time (bookmakers said 50.5%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

No, not both

Correct
Our model 64%Bookmakers 63%

Our track record

In 2,480 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 62.5% of the time (bookmakers said 61.6%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 2.5 goals

Correct
Our model 73%Bookmakers 53%

Our track record

In 289 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.6% of the time (bookmakers said 71.6%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 89%Bookmakers 75%

Our track record

In 399 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 85–90% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 87.7% of the time (bookmakers said 86.2%).

First Half Result →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Correct

The bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Zamalek ahead at half-time.

Our model 51%Bookmakers 41%

Our track record

Too few similar matches in the last 12 months for a track record.

Zamalek Goals →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Zamalek 0–1 goals

Correct

The bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Zamalek 2+ goals.

Our model 69%Bookmakers 46%

Our track record

In 77 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 50.6% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.1% than to our 65–70%.

Al Ittihad Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Ittihad 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 86%Bookmakers 88%

Our track record

In 600 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 85–90% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 85.2% of the time (bookmakers said 85.0%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Zamalek vs Al Ittihad 0-0 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Zamalek vs Al Ittihad. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
ZamalekZamalek0
Al IttihadAl Ittihad0

Winner

1X 79%

BTTS*

No 64%

Correct Score

1-0 19%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

under 73%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 79%

Full Time

146%
X33%
221%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT46%54%73%27%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT79%21%95%5%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Zamalek32%68%69%31%
Al Ittihad52%48%86%14%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Zamalek90%10%97%3%
Al Ittihad97%3%99%1%

1st Half

132%
X51%
217%

1st Score

154%
X17%
229%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

26%

X-X

23%

X-1

18%

2-2

10%

X-2

9%

1-X

5%

2-X

5%

2-1

2%

1-2

1%

Correct Score

1-0

18.7%

0-0

16.6%

1-1

13.4%

2-0

10.4%

0-1

10.3%

2-1

7.8%

1-2

4.0%

0-2

3.5%

3-0

3.3%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Asyut Petrol – Zamalek prediction & betting tips (Oct 20, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores