1. AmaZulu vs Magesi

AmaZulu vs Magesi 0-0 Score & Prediction Review

Premier League - Season 2025/2026 (Round 20)

Fair result
AmaZuluAmaZulu

0–0

MagesiMagesi
0.6Chances (xG)1.0

On these chances AmaZulu would usually take 1.0 points and Magesi 1.6; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: AmaZulu.

AmaZulu 0.0 pts vs chancesMagesi −0.6 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

AmaZulu vs Magesi stats: how the match was played

Premier League

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

AmaZulu had more than twice the shots on target

AmaZulu

Magesi

2

Shots on target

1

1

Big chances

0

4

Corners

3

3

Yellow cards

1

1

Red cards

0

65%

Possession

35%

The match between AmaZulu and Magesi ended 0-0. Our AI model predicted a AmaZulu win at 45% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Overall a solid read on this match, with 3 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Both Teams To Score, Over/Under 2.5 Goals & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: AmaZulu – Golden Arrows prediction & betting tips (Oct 31, 2026).

AmaZulu vs Magesi — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Premier League

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

AmaZulu to win

Wrong
Our model 45%Bookmakers 43%

Our track record

In 3,609 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 47.3% of the time (bookmakers said 47.0%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

No, not both

Correct
Our model 55%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 5,695 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 56.8% of the time (bookmakers said 57.8%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 2.5 goals

Correct
Our model 61%Bookmakers 70%

Our track record

In 3,092 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.3% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 81%Bookmakers 87%

Our track record

In 1,715 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 80–85% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 80.5% of the time (bookmakers said 81.3%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Correct
Our model 50%Bookmakers 50%

Our track record

In 4,253 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 48.1% of the time (bookmakers said 47.2%).

AmaZulu Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

AmaZulu 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 63%Bookmakers 70%

Our track record

In 3,460 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 64.0% of the time (bookmakers said 64.0%).

Magesi Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Magesi 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 78%Bookmakers 79%

Our track record

In 2,579 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 74.8% of the time (bookmakers said 76.4%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

AmaZulu vs Magesi 0-0 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for AmaZulu vs Magesi. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
AmaZuluAmaZulu0
MagesiMagesi0

Winner

1X 74%

BTTS*

No 55%

Correct Score

1-0 14%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

under 61%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 71%

Full Time

145%
X29%
226%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT36%64%61%39%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT71%29%90%10%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
AmaZulu29%71%63%37%
Magesi43%57%78%22%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
AmaZulu85%15%95%5%
Magesi94%6%99%2%

1st Half

129%
X50%
221%

1st Score

149%
X12%
239%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

22%

X-X

22%

X-1

16%

2-2

14%

X-2

13%

1-X

5%

2-X

5%

1-2

2%

2-1

2%

Correct Score

1-0

13.7%

1-1

12.7%

0-0

11.8%

0-1

10.3%

2-0

8.3%

2-1

8.3%

1-2

6.0%

0-2

4.3%

2-2

3.9%

3-0

3.9%

3-1

3.6%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: AmaZulu – Golden Arrows prediction & betting tips (Oct 31, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores