2. Leagues
  3. Pro League
  4. Al Hazm vs Al Draih

Al Hazm vs Al Draih 0-1 Score & Prediction Review

Pro League - Season 2026/2027 (Round 2)

Fair result
Al HazmAl Hazm

0–1

Al DraihAl Draih
0.6Chances (xG)1.3

On these chances Al Hazm would usually take 0.8 points and Al Draih 2.0; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Al Draih.

Al Hazm −0.8 pts vs chancesAl Draih +1.0 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Al Hazm vs Al Draih stats: how the match was played

Pro League

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Al Draih had more than twice the shots on target

Al Hazm

Al Draih

2

Shots on target

5

1

Big chances

3

4

Corners

1

2

Yellow cards

1

54%

Possession

46%

The match between Al Hazm and Al Draih ended 0-1. Our AI model correctly predicted an Al Draih win with 69% confidence before kick-off. Our model got 1 out of 4 markets right, correctly predicting Full-Time Result — a reminder that football can be unpredictable, but the data continues to sharpen future predictions.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Al Hilal – Al Hazm prediction & betting tips (Oct 19, 2026).

Al Hazm vs Al Draih — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Pro League

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Draih to win

Correct
Our model 69%Bookmakers 50%

Our track record

In 616 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 70.5% of the time (bookmakers said 70.8%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Wrong
Our model 55%Bookmakers 60%

Our track record

In 6,501 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 62%Bookmakers 56%

Our track record

In 3,115 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.5% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 59%Bookmakers 66%

Our track record

In 937 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 60.1% of the time (bookmakers said 60.1%).

First Half Result →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Draih ahead at half-time

Correct

The bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Draw at half-time.

Our model 50%Bookmakers 35%

Our track record

In 531 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 35.8% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 38.9% than to our 45–50%.

Al Hazm Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Hazm 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 82%Bookmakers 63%

Our track record

In 395 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 80–85% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 80.5% of the time (bookmakers said 80.6%).

Al Draih Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Draih 2+ goals

Wrong
Our model 66%Bookmakers 50%

Our track record

In 3,280 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.3% of the time (bookmakers said 67.7%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Al Hazm vs Al Draih 0-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Al Hazm vs Al Draih. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
Pro League - Saudi Arabia
Al HazmAl Hazm0
Al DraihAl Draih1

Winner

2 69%

BTTS*

Yes 55%

Correct Score

0-2 10%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 62%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

over 51%

Full Time

113%
X18%
269%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT18%82%38%62%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT49%51%71%29%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Al Hazm53%47%82%18%
Al Draih12%88%34%66%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Al Hazm95%5%99%1%
Al Draih59%41%79%21%

1st Half

115%
X35%
250%

1st Score

128%
X5%
268%

Half Time/Full Time

2-2

47%

X-2

18%

X-X

11%

1-1

7%

X-1

5%

1-2

4%

2-X

4%

1-X

3%

2-1

1%

Correct Score

0-2

10.1%

1-2

9.8%

0-1

9.2%

1-1

8.3%

0-3

7.6%

1-3

7.3%

0-0

4.5%

2-2

4.3%

1-0

3.8%

2-3

3.7%

2-1

3.3%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Al Hilal – Al Hazm prediction & betting tips (Oct 19, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores