2. Leagues
  3. Pro League
  4. NEOM SC vs Al-Qadsiah

NEOM SC vs Al Quadisiya 0-2 Score & Prediction Review

Pro League - Season 2026/2027 (Round 3)

Fair result
NEOM SCNEOM SC

0–2

Al QuadisiyaAl Quadisiya
1.9Chances (xG)1.7

On these chances NEOM SC would usually take 1.5 points and Al Quadisiya 1.3; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Al Quadisiya.

NEOM SC −1.5 pts vs chancesAl Quadisiya +1.7 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

NEOM SC vs Al Quadisiya stats: how the match was played

Pro League

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

NEOM SC had clearly more shots on target

NEOM SC

Al Quadisiya

5

Shots on target

3

4

Big chances

3

2

Corners

2

1

Yellow cards

1

52%

Possession

49%

The match between NEOM SC and Al Quadisiya ended 0-2. Our AI model correctly predicted an Al Quadisiya win with 63% confidence before kick-off. Our model got 1 out of 4 markets right, correctly predicting Full-Time Result — a reminder that football can be unpredictable, but the data continues to sharpen future predictions.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Al Taawoun – Al Quadisiya prediction & betting tips (Oct 20, 2026).

NEOM SC vs Al Quadisiya — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Pro League

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Quadisiya to win

Correct
Our model 63%Bookmakers 66%

Our track record

In 1,062 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 67.0% of the time (bookmakers said 66.4%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Wrong
Our model 59%Bookmakers 60%

Our track record

In 5,732 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 56.8% of the time (bookmakers said 57.7%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 64%Bookmakers 63%

Our track record

In 3,115 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.5% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 57%Bookmakers 58%

Our track record

In 937 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 60.1% of the time (bookmakers said 60.1%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Quadisiya ahead at half-time

Correct
Our model 46%Bookmakers 46%

Our track record

In 4,247 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 47.8% of the time (bookmakers said 47.3%).

NEOM SC Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

NEOM SC 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 76%Bookmakers 70%

Our track record

In 842 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 74.0% of the time (bookmakers said 76.5%).

Al Quadisiya Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Quadisiya 2+ goals

Correct
Our model 64%Bookmakers 63%

Our track record

In 2,695 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.1% of the time (bookmakers said 63.8%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

NEOM SC vs Al Quadisiya 0-2 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for NEOM SC vs Al Quadisiya. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
Pro League - Saudi Arabia
NEOM SCNEOM SC0
Al QuadisiyaAl Quadisiya2

Winner

2 63%

BTTS*

Yes 58%

Correct Score

1-2 10%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 64%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

over 53%

Full Time

117%
X20%
263%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT16%84%36%64%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT47%53%71%29%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
NEOM SC46%54%76%24%
Al Quadisiya13%87%36%64%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
NEOM SC92%8%98%2%
Al Quadisiya61%39%81%19%

1st Half

119%
X36%
246%

1st Score

131%
X4%
265%

Half Time/Full Time

2-2

39%

X-2

17%

X-X

12%

1-1

10%

X-1

7%

1-X

5%

1-2

4%

2-X

4%

2-1

2%

Correct Score

1-2

9.6%

0-2

9.0%

1-1

8.6%

0-1

7.8%

1-3

7.3%

0-3

6.6%

2-2

5.3%

2-3

4.5%

2-1

4.4%

0-0

4.3%

1-0

4.0%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Al Taawoun – Al Quadisiya prediction & betting tips (Oct 20, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores