Young Boys vs Thun 1-2 Score & Prediction Review
Super League - Season 2025/2026 (Round 29)
1–2
On these chances Young Boys would usually take 1.4 points and Thun 1.4; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Young Boys.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Young Boys vs Thun stats: how the match was played
Super League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Level on shots on target
Young Boys
Thun
6
Shots on target
5
4
Big chances
5
3
Corners
7
4
Yellow cards
4
51%
Possession
49%
Young Boys vs Thun — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Super League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Young Boys to win
WrongOur track record
In 3,579 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 46.8% of the time (bookmakers said 46.8%).
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
CorrectOur track record
In 404 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.6% of the time (bookmakers said 65.2%).
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 1,131 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 67.7% of the time (bookmakers said 66.8%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 278 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 57.9% of the time (bookmakers said 57.8%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
WrongOur track record
In 2,012 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 40.2% of the time (bookmakers said 41.2%).
Our model’s pick
Young Boys 0–1 goals
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Young Boys 2+ goals.
Our track record
In 1,837 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 41.9% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 43.7% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Thun 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 987 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 60.2% of the time (bookmakers said 59.2%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Young Boys vs Thun 1-2 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Young Boys vs Thun. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
1X 64%
BTTS*
Yes 66%
Correct Score
1-1 09%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 68%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
over 56%
Winner
1X 64%
BTTS*
Yes 66%
Correct Score
1-1 09%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 68%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
over 56%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 14% | 86% | 32% | 68% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 44% | 56% | 69% | 31% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24% | 76% | 51% | 49% | |
| 27% | 73% | 54% | 46% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 75% | 25% | 89% | 11% | |
| 77% | 23% | 90% | 10% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
26%
2-2
19%
X-1
14%
X-X
14%
X-2
11%
1-X
6%
2-X
5%
1-2
3%
2-1
3%
Correct Score
1-1
9.2%
2-1
8.4%
1-2
7.6%
2-2
6.9%
1-0
5.7%
0-1
4.8%
2-0
4.8%
3-1
4.8%
1-3
4.2%
3-2
4.2%
0-2
3.9%
2-3
3.8%
0-0
3.4%
3-0
3.1%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score