- Home
- Daejeon Citizen vs Ulsan HD
Daejeon Citizen vs Ulsan 2-2 Score & Prediction Review
K-League 1 - Season 2026 (Round 18)
2–2
On these chances Daejeon Citizen would usually take 1.3 points and Ulsan 1.5; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: Daejeon Citizen.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Daejeon Citizen vs Ulsan stats: how the match was played
K-League 1
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Level on shots on target
Daejeon Citizen
Ulsan
3
Shots on target
4
3
Big chances
2
6
Corners
3
1
Yellow cards
0
52%
Possession
49%
Daejeon Citizen vs Ulsan — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · K-League 1
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Ulsan to win
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Daejeon Citizen to win.
Our track record
In 1,528 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 28.8% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 29.5% than to our 35–40%.
Our model’s pick
No, not both
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Yes, both score.
Our track record
In 3,139 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 46.5% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.4% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Under 2.5 goals
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Over 2.5 goals.
Our track record
In 817 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 46.6% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.4% than to our 55–60%.
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
WrongOur track record
In 3,681 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 75.9% of the time (bookmakers said 76.3%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
WrongOur track record
In 6,723 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.2%).
Our model’s pick
Daejeon Citizen 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 1,588 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.5% of the time (bookmakers said 72.0%).
Our model’s pick
Ulsan 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 2,695 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.1% of the time (bookmakers said 63.8%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Daejeon Citizen vs Ulsan 2-2 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Daejeon Citizen vs Ulsan. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
12 71%
BTTS*
No 51%
Correct Score
1-1 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 57%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 68%
Winner
12 71%
BTTS*
No 51%
Correct Score
1-1 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 57%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 68%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 31% | 69% | 57% | 43% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 68% | 32% | 89% | 11% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 34% | 66% | 70% | 30% | |
| 29% | 71% | 65% | 35% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 91% | 9% | 98% | 2% | |
| 87% | 13% | 96% | 4% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
2-2
22%
X-X
18%
1-1
17%
X-2
15%
X-1
13%
2-X
6%
1-X
5%
1-2
2%
2-1
2%
Correct Score
1-1
14.0%
0-1
11.3%
1-0
10.2%
0-0
9.2%
1-2
8.7%
2-1
7.4%
0-2
6.9%
2-0
5.6%
2-2
5.1%
1-3
3.4%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score