2. Leagues
  3. Super League
  4. Wuhan Three Towns vs Shenzhen Peng City

Wuhan Three Towns vs Sichuan 2-0 Score & Prediction Review

Super League - Season 2026 (Round 19)

Fair result
Wuhan Three TownsWuhan Three Towns

2–0

SichuanSichuan
2.7Chances (xG)0.8

On these chances Wuhan Three Towns would usually take 2.5 points and Sichuan 0.4; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Wuhan Three Towns.

Wuhan Three Towns +0.5 pts vs chancesSichuan −0.4 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Wuhan Three Towns vs Sichuan stats: how the match was played

Super League

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Wuhan Three Towns had more than twice the shots on target

Wuhan Three Towns

Sichuan

13

Shots on target

1

3

Big chances

1

11

Corners

4

1

Yellow cards

0

0

Red cards

1

67%

Possession

33%

The match between Wuhan Three Towns and Sichuan ended 2-0. Our AI model correctly predicted a Wuhan Three Towns win with 47% confidence before kick-off. Overall a solid read on this match, with 2 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Full-Time Result & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Sichuan – Shanghai Shenhua prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Wuhan Three Towns vs Sichuan — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Super League

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Wuhan Three Towns to win

Correct
Our model 47%Bookmakers 38%

Our track record

In 3,513 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 49.3% of the time (bookmakers said 50.5%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Wrong
Our model 54%Bookmakers 60%

Our track record

In 6,501 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 50%Bookmakers 55%

Our track record

In 5,191 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 57.0% of the time (bookmakers said 56.4%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 72%Bookmakers 68%

Our track record

In 4,587 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 72.3% of the time (bookmakers said 71.6%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Wrong
Our model 42%Bookmakers 41%

Our track record

In 6,723 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.2%).

Wuhan Three Towns Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Wuhan Three Towns 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 56%Bookmakers 54%

Our track record

In 3,480 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.8% of the time (bookmakers said 61.1%).

Sichuan Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Sichuan 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 71%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 3,381 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.5% of the time (bookmakers said 72.0%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Wuhan Three Towns vs Sichuan 2-0 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Wuhan Three Towns vs Sichuan. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
Super League - China
Wuhan Three TownsWuhan Three Towns2
SichuanSichuan0

Winner

1X 72%

BTTS*

Yes 54%

Correct Score

1-1 12%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 50%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 62%

Full Time

147%
X26%
228%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT25%75%50%50%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT62%38%85%15%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Wuhan Three Towns23%77%56%44%
Sichuan37%63%71%29%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Wuhan Three Towns81%19%93%7%
Sichuan90%10%97%3%

1st Half

134%
X42%
225%

1st Score

156%
X7%
237%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

26%

X-1

16%

2-2

15%

X-X

14%

X-2

11%

1-X

6%

2-X

6%

2-1

4%

1-2

3%

Correct Score

1-1

12.1%

1-0

11.0%

2-1

9.4%

2-0

8.1%

0-1

7.7%

1-2

6.9%

0-0

6.8%

2-2

5.5%

3-1

4.7%

0-2

4.2%

3-0

4.1%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Sichuan – Shanghai Shenhua prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores