Super Liga Kina Prognoze i Statistika
Kineska Super liga je najviši rang profesionalnog fudbala u Kini. Sastoji se od 16 timova i funkcioniše po sistemu promocije i ispadanja. Kineska Super liga je poznata po visokoprofilnim transferima i ambicioznim klubovima. Guangzhou Evergrande Taobao FC je najuspešniji klub u istoriji lige.
Super Liga prognoze po marketu
Sezona 2026 · Kolo 11 · Regularna sezona
Krajni Rezultat (1x2)
51.1%
PROSEČNA USPEŠNOST
43% Prosek kvota
+18.8% Znatno iznad proseka
Oba tima daju gol
55.6%
PROSEČNA USPEŠNOST
54.2% Prosek kvota
+2.6% Iznad proseka
3+ ili 0-2 golova
63.3%
PROSEČNA USPEŠNOST
53.8% Prosek kvota
+17.7% Znatno iznad proseka
4+ ili 0-3 golova
66.7%
PROSEČNA USPEŠNOST
61.2% Prosek kvota
+9% Iznad proseka
Rezultat (P1)
37.8%
PROSEČNA USPEŠNOST
37.9% Prosek kvota
-0.3% Blizu proseka
Tačan rezultat
10%
PROSEČNA USPEŠNOST
Naš AI model analizira utakmice Super Liga na 6 tržišta klađenja — Krajni Rezultat (1x2), Oba tima daju gol, 3+ ili 0-2 golova, 4+ ili 0-3 golova, Rezultat (P1), Tačan rezultat. Svaka kartica iznad upoređuje tačnost naših prognoza sa realnom šansom prema kvotama kladionica (prikazanom kao isprekidana linija). Zeleni stubići znače da model nadmašuje očekivanja kladionica; crveni da kladionice trenutno imaju oštriju prednost. Na svim tržištima, naš model nadmašuje kvote kladionica na 4 od 5 tržišta ove sezone. Prognoze za Tačan rezultat u Super Liga trenutno pogađaju sa 10%.
Krajni Rezultat (1x2) je naše najjače tržište klađenja za Super Liga ove sezone sa 51% tačnosti prognoza — to je 18.8% iznad realne šanse prema kvotama od 43%. To znači da naš AI model tačno predviđa ishode Krajni Rezultat (1x2) značajno češće nego što kvote kladionica sugerišu, što ga čini idealnim tržištem za pronalaženje value bet oklada u Super Liga.
Sa druge strane, prognoze za Rezultat (P1) trenutno su 0.3% ispod realne šanse prema kvotama sa 38%. Kvote kladionica su posebno precizne za Super Liga Rezultat (P1) oklade, pa igrači treba da budu posebno oprezni i razmotre kombinovanje ovih tipova u tikete umesto pojedinačnih oklada.
Preostala tržišta — Oba tima daju gol, 3+ ili 0-2 golova, 4+ ili 0-3 golova — pokazuju rezultate blizu ili iznad očekivanja kladionica, nudeći umerene prednosti za prognoze Super Liga zasnovane na podacima.
Današnji Tipovi za Klađenje za Super Liga Kina
| 1 | 51% | |
| X | 28% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Youth Island | 25% | 75% | 59% | 41% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 49% | 51% | 81% | 19% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 61% | 39% | 71% | 29% |
| 1-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.1% | 12.1% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 8.4% | 7.9% |
| 1 | 51% | |
| X | 28% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 75% | 59% | 41% | |
| 49% | 51% | 81% | 19% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 61% | 39% | 71% | 29% |
| 1-0 | 0-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16.1% | 12.1% | 11.6% | 10.6% | 8.4% | 7.9% |
| 1 | 32% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 45% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichuan | 31% | 69% | 61% | 39% |
| Shandong Taishan | 22% | 78% | 50% | 50% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 37% | 63% | 49% | 51% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.3% | 9.1% | 7.3% | 7.1% | 7.0% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 32% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 45% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31% | 69% | 61% | 39% | |
| 22% | 78% | 50% | 50% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 37% | 63% | 49% | 51% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.3% | 9.1% | 7.3% | 7.1% | 7.0% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 20% | 80% | 49% | 51% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 34% | 66% | 64% | 36% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 51% | 49% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 7.2% | 6.8% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20% | 80% | 49% | 51% | |
| 34% | 66% | 64% | 36% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 51% | 49% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 7.2% | 6.8% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 55% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 22% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hangzhou | 17% | 83% | 45% | 55% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 41% | 59% | 73% | 27% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 9.9% | 9.2% | 8.6% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 55% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 22% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17% | 83% | 45% | 55% | |
| 41% | 59% | 73% | 27% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 9.9% | 9.2% | 8.6% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 53% | |
| X | 22% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Guoan | 17% | 83% | 44% | 56% |
| Shanghai Port | 37% | 63% | 67% | 33% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 36% | 64% | 48% | 52% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 3-1 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.8% | 9.5% | 7.3% | 6.8% | 6.5% | 6.2% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 53% | |
| X | 22% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17% | 83% | 44% | 56% | |
| 37% | 63% | 67% | 33% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 36% | 64% | 48% | 52% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 3-1 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.8% | 9.5% | 7.3% | 6.8% | 6.5% | 6.2% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 38% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 28% | 72% | 61% | 39% |
| Dalian Zhixing | 30% | 70% | 64% | 36% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 48% | 52% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.4% | 9.1% | 8.7% | 8.4% | 8.2% | 6.7% | 6.2% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 38% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28% | 72% | 61% | 39% | |
| 30% | 70% | 64% | 36% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 48% | 52% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.4% | 9.1% | 8.7% | 8.4% | 8.2% | 6.7% | 6.2% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 23% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 50% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 42% | 58% | 76% | 25% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 23% | 77% | 55% | 45% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 53% | 47% | 64% | 36% |
| 0-1 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.6% | 11.7% | 9.2% | 9.1% | 8.9% | 7.5% |
| 1 | 23% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 50% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42% | 58% | 76% | 25% | |
| 23% | 77% | 55% | 45% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 53% | 47% | 64% | 36% |
| 0-1 | 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 1-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.6% | 11.7% | 9.2% | 9.1% | 8.9% | 7.5% |
| 1 | 61% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan Songshan Longmen | 15% | 85% | 41% | 59% |
| Sichuan | 46% | 54% | 77% | 23% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 54% | 46% |
| 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 6.8% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 61% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15% | 85% | 41% | 59% | |
| 46% | 54% | 77% | 23% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 54% | 46% |
| 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 9.8% | 6.8% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 53% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Port | 17% | 83% | 42% | 58% |
| Hangzhou | 35% | 65% | 65% | 35% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 33% | 67% | 46% | 54% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.7% | 9.3% | 6.9% | 6.7% | 6.5% | 6.3% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 53% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17% | 83% | 42% | 58% | |
| 35% | 65% | 65% | 35% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 33% | 67% | 46% | 54% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.7% | 9.3% | 6.9% | 6.7% | 6.5% | 6.3% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 25% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalian Zhixing | 24% | 76% | 57% | 43% |
| Qingdao Youth Island | 40% | 60% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 54% | 46% | 66% | 34% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.6% | 12.4% | 9.4% | 9.1% | 8.3% | 8.1% | 6.4% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 25% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24% | 76% | 57% | 43% | |
| 40% | 60% | 75% | 25% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 54% | 46% | 66% | 34% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.6% | 12.4% | 9.4% | 9.1% | 8.3% | 8.1% | 6.4% |
| 1 | 62% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Guoan | 14% | 86% | 38% | 62% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 46% | 54% | 76% | 24% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 38% | 62% | 49% | 51% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.8% | 9.3% | 8.9% | 8.7% | 6.9% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 62% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14% | 86% | 38% | 62% | |
| 46% | 54% | 76% | 24% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 38% | 62% | 49% | 51% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.8% | 9.3% | 8.9% | 8.7% | 6.9% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 40% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29% | 71% | 61% | 39% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 32% | 68% | 64% | 36% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.6% | 9.3% | 8.3% | 8.2% | 7.8% | 7.0% | 6.9% |
| 1 | 40% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29% | 71% | 61% | 39% | |
| 32% | 68% | 64% | 36% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.6% | 9.3% | 8.3% | 8.2% | 7.8% | 7.0% | 6.9% |
| 1 | 56% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shandong Taishan | 18% | 82% | 47% | 53% |
| Chongqing Tonglianglong FC | 42% | 58% | 76% | 24% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 58% | 42% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 10.7% | 10.0% | 9.2% |
| 1 | 56% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18% | 82% | 47% | 53% | |
| 42% | 58% | 76% | 24% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 58% | 42% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 10.7% | 10.0% | 9.2% |
| 1 | 36% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 40% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yunnan Yukun | 28% | 72% | 59% | 41% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 26% | 74% | 56% | 44% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.9% | 9.1% | 8.2% | 7.4% | 7.0% | 6.6% |
| 1 | 36% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 40% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28% | 72% | 59% | 41% | |
| 26% | 74% | 56% | 44% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.9% | 9.1% | 8.2% | 7.4% | 7.0% | 6.6% |
| 1 | 39% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 36% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichuan | 26% | 74% | 58% | 42% |
| Dalian Zhixing | 28% | 72% | 60% | 40% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.4% | 8.8% | 8.3% | 8.0% | 7.1% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 39% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 36% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26% | 74% | 58% | 42% | |
| 28% | 72% | 60% | 40% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.4% | 8.8% | 8.3% | 8.0% | 7.1% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 36% | |
| X | 29% | |
| 2 | 36% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 33% | 67% | 68% | 32% |
| Henan Songshan Longmen | 33% | 67% | 68% | 32% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 58% | 42% | 68% | 32% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.1% | 11.3% | 10.8% | 9.8% | 7.9% | 7.7% | 6.6% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 36% | |
| X | 29% | |
| 2 | 36% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 33% | 67% | 68% | 32% | |
| 33% | 67% | 68% | 32% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 58% | 42% | 68% | 32% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.1% | 11.3% | 10.8% | 9.8% | 7.9% | 7.7% | 6.6% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 65% | |
| X | 19% | |
| 2 | 16% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 13% | 87% | 38% | 62% |
| Shanghai Port | 49% | 51% | 79% | 21% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 53% | 47% |
| 2-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.3% | 10.0% | 9.5% | 9.1% | 7.8% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 65% | |
| X | 19% | |
| 2 | 16% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13% | 87% | 38% | 62% | |
| 49% | 51% | 79% | 21% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 53% | 47% |
| 2-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.3% | 10.0% | 9.5% | 9.1% | 7.8% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 32% | |
| X | 28% | |
| 2 | 40% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Youth Island | 36% | 64% | 71% | 29% |
| Beijing Guoan | 30% | 70% | 63% | 37% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 56% | 44% | 66% | 34% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.3% | 10.9% | 10.4% | 9.7% | 8.1% | 6.8% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 32% | |
| X | 28% | |
| 2 | 40% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36% | 64% | 71% | 29% | |
| 30% | 70% | 63% | 37% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 56% | 44% | 66% | 34% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.3% | 10.9% | 10.4% | 9.7% | 8.1% | 6.8% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 51% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 25% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 20% | 80% | 50% | 50% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 39% | 61% | 72% | 28% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 58% | 42% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.0% | 10.2% | 9.6% | 8.3% | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 51% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 25% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20% | 80% | 50% | 50% | |
| 39% | 61% | 72% | 28% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 58% | 42% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.0% | 10.2% | 9.6% | 8.3% | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 69% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 11% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 13% | 87% | 38% | 62% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 59% | 42% | 86% | 14% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.2% | 12.5% | 8.9% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 7.1% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 69% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 11% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13% | 87% | 38% | 62% | |
| 59% | 42% | 86% | 14% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.2% | 12.5% | 8.9% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 7.1% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 44% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 32% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hangzhou | 23% | 77% | 52% | 48% |
| Shandong Taishan | 31% | 69% | 62% | 38% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 52% | 48% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-2 | 2-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.7% | 9.4% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 6.6% | 6.2% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 44% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 32% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23% | 77% | 52% | 48% | |
| 31% | 69% | 62% | 38% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 52% | 48% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-2 | 2-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.7% | 9.4% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 6.6% | 6.2% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 56% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chongqing Tonglianglong FC | 17% | 83% | 46% | 54% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 43% | 57% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.7% | 10.7% | 10.0% | 9.5% |
| 1 | 56% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17% | 83% | 46% | 54% | |
| 43% | 57% | 75% | 25% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.7% | 10.7% | 10.0% | 9.5% |
| 1 | 56% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 23% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Port | 16% | 84% | 41% | 59% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 40% | 60% | 70% | 30% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 36% | 64% | 48% | 52% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.7% | 9.4% | 8.0% | 7.7% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 56% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 23% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16% | 84% | 41% | 59% | |
| 40% | 60% | 70% | 30% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 36% | 64% | 48% | 52% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.7% | 9.4% | 8.0% | 7.7% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 52% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 24% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Guoan | 18% | 82% | 47% | 53% |
| Henan Songshan Longmen | 38% | 62% | 70% | 30% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.0% | 9.8% | 9.2% | 7.9% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 52% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 24% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18% | 82% | 47% | 53% | |
| 38% | 62% | 70% | 30% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.0% | 9.8% | 9.2% | 7.9% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 32% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 41% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalian Zhixing | 32% | 68% | 65% | 35% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 25% | 75% | 58% | 42% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 47% | 53% | 60% | 40% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.2% | 9.2% | 9.1% | 7.9% | 7.8% | 6.6% | 6.4% |
| 1 | 32% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 41% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32% | 68% | 65% | 35% | |
| 25% | 75% | 58% | 42% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 47% | 53% | 60% | 40% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.2% | 9.2% | 9.1% | 7.9% | 7.8% | 6.6% | 6.4% |
*Verovatnoća svakog predviđenog ishoda je izražena u procente (%)
*GG - Oba tima daju gol
Super Liga tačnost prognoza po timovima
Statistike ispod prikazuju tačnost AI prognoza za svako tržište klađenja u Super Liga na nivou timova. Za svako tržište rangiramo timove gde naš model ima najbolje rezultate — na primer, Sichuan predvodi Krajni Rezultat (1x2) prognoze sa 73% tačnosti (8 tačnih od 11 prognoza). Nizovi forme prognoza pokazuju koje timove naš model u poslednje vreme tačno predviđa — niz uzastopnih tačnih prognoza (prikazanih kao zelene tačke) ukazuje da model dobro čita trenutne obrasce tog tima. Timovi sa nizom tačnih prognoza na tržištu sa visokom prednošću kao što je Krajni Rezultat (1x2) posebno su vredni pažnje za vašu sledeću okladu na Super Liga.
Tabela forme na dnu ističe timove Super Liga u najboljoj trenutnoj formi na osnovu poslednjih rezultata — korisno za identifikovanje timova u formi koji mogu ponuditi dodatnu vrednost za klađenje.
Super Liga Krajni Rezultat (1x2) tačnost prognoza
Najtačnije prognozirani timovi
Forme predviđanja
Super Liga Oba tima daju gol tačnost prognoza
Najtačnije prognozirani timovi
Forme predviđanja
Super Liga 3+ ili 0-2 golova tačnost prognoza
Najtačnije prognozirani timovi
Forme predviđanja
Super Liga 4+ ili 0-3 golova tačnost prognoza
Najtačnije prognozirani timovi
Forme predviđanja
Super Liga Rezultat (P1) tačnost prognoza
Najtačnije prognozirani timovi
Forme predviđanja
Super Liga timovi u najboljoj formi
Super Liga Kina Tabela
Pogledajte trenutnu tabelu lige, pozicije timova, bodove i formu. Kliknite da vidite kompletan poredak sa detaljnim statistikama.
#TIM | OS | B | P | N | I | G | GR | FORMA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 11 | 31 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 30:9 | +21 | P P P P P |
2 | 11 | 20 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 15:10 | +5 | N N I N P |
3 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 16:20 | -4 | I I P I P |
4 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 23:20 | +3 | P I N P I |
5 | 11 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 18:16 | +2 | P P N I P |