- Home
- Shandong Taishan vs Qingdao Hainiu
Shandong Taishan vs Qingdao Hainiu 3-1 Score & Prediction Review
Super League - Season 2026 (Round 23)
3–1
On these chances Shandong Taishan would usually take 2.0 points and Qingdao Hainiu 0.8; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Shandong Taishan.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Shandong Taishan vs Qingdao Hainiu stats: how the match was played
Super League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Shandong Taishan had clearly more shots on target
Shandong Taishan
Qingdao Hainiu
7
Shots on target
5
9
Big chances
0
4
Corners
4
2
Yellow cards
1
53%
Possession
47%
Shandong Taishan vs Qingdao Hainiu — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Super League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Shandong Taishan to win
CorrectOur track record
In 616 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 70.5% of the time (bookmakers said 70.8%).
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
CorrectOur track record
In 6,501 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,115 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.5% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Over 3.5 goals.
Our track record
In 257 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 44.4% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.1% than to our 55–60%.
Our model’s pick
Shandong Taishan ahead at half-time
CorrectOur track record
In 4,247 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 47.8% of the time (bookmakers said 47.3%).
Our model’s pick
Shandong Taishan 2+ goals
CorrectOur track record
In 2,712 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.9% of the time (bookmakers said 67.6%).
Our model’s pick
Qingdao Hainiu 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 1,503 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 80–85% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 78.8% of the time (bookmakers said 80.6%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Shandong Taishan vs Qingdao Hainiu 3-1 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Shandong Taishan vs Qingdao Hainiu. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
1 69%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
1-0 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 61%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
over 50%
Winner
1 69%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
1-0 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 61%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
over 50%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 19% | 81% | 39% | 61% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 50% | 50% | 72% | 28% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12% | 88% | 35% | 65% | |
| 55% | 45% | 82% | 18% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 60% | 40% | 79% | 21% | |
| 95% | 5% | 98% | 2% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
45%
X-1
20%
X-X
9%
2-2
7%
X-2
5%
2-1
5%
2-X
4%
1-X
3%
1-2
2%
Correct Score
1-0
10.7%
2-0
10.5%
2-1
9.3%
3-0
7.7%
1-1
7.6%
3-1
6.8%
0-0
5.2%
2-2
3.9%
1-2
3.6%
0-1
3.4%
3-2
3.4%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score