- Home
- Qingdao West Coast vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 0-0 Score & Prediction Review
Super League - Season 2026 (Round 23)
0–0
On these chances Qingdao Youth Island would usually take 1.8 points and Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 1.0; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: Qingdao Youth Island.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC stats: how the match was played
Super League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Level on shots on target
Qingdao Youth Island
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
3
Shots on target
3
3
Big chances
1
3
Corners
4
0
Yellow cards
1
57%
Possession
43%
Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Super League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Qingdao Youth Island to win
WrongOur track record
In 3,622 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 47.0% of the time (bookmakers said 46.9%).
Our model’s pick
No, not both
CorrectOur track record
In 6,495 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).
Our model’s pick
Under 2.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,111 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.5% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,678 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 75.9% of the time (bookmakers said 76.3%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
CorrectOur track record
In 4,241 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 47.8% of the time (bookmakers said 47.3%).
Our model’s pick
Qingdao Youth Island 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,458 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.8% of the time (bookmakers said 63.9%).
Our model’s pick
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,376 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.5% of the time (bookmakers said 72.1%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 0-0 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Qingdao Youth Island vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
1X 72%
BTTS*
No 55%
Correct Score
1-0 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 60%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 70%
Winner
1X 72%
BTTS*
No 55%
Correct Score
1-0 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 60%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 70%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 35% | 65% | 60% | 40% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 70% | 30% | 90% | 10% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29% | 71% | 64% | 36% | |
| 41% | 59% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86% | 14% | 96% | 4% | |
| 92% | 8% | 98% | 2% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
22%
X-X
18%
2-2
17%
X-1
14%
X-2
13%
1-X
6%
2-X
6%
2-1
3%
1-2
2%
Correct Score
1-0
13.9%
1-1
12.7%
0-0
10.9%
0-1
9.8%
2-0
8.4%
2-1
8.2%
1-2
6.3%
0-2
4.6%
2-2
4.5%
3-0
3.5%
3-1
3.4%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score