- Home
- Gillingham vs Luton Town
Gillingham vs Luton Town 0-3 Score & Prediction Review
Carabao Cup - Season 2026/2027 1st Round (Knock Out)
0–3
On these chances Gillingham would usually take 0.4 points and Luton Town 2.5; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Luton Town.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Gillingham vs Luton Town stats: how the match was played
Carabao Cup
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Luton Town had more than twice the shots on target
Gillingham
Luton Town
2
Shots on target
11
0
Big chances
6
2
Corners
9
1
Yellow cards
1
34%
Possession
66%
Gillingham vs Luton Town — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Carabao Cup
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Luton Town to win
CorrectOur track record
In 1,802 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.2% of the time (bookmakers said 61.3%).
Our model’s pick
No, not both
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Yes, both score.
Our track record
In 3,139 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 46.5% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.4% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 5,191 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 57.0% of the time (bookmakers said 56.4%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,986 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.3% of the time (bookmakers said 66.8%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
WrongOur track record
In 6,723 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.2%).
Our model’s pick
Gillingham 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 842 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 74.0% of the time (bookmakers said 76.5%).
Our model’s pick
Luton Town 2+ goals
CorrectOur track record
In 1,014 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.6% of the time (bookmakers said 59.2%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Gillingham vs Luton Town 0-3 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Gillingham vs Luton Town. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
2 56%
BTTS*
No 51%
Correct Score
0-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 53%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 59%
Winner
2 56%
BTTS*
No 51%
Correct Score
0-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 53%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 59%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 24% | 76% | 47% | 53% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 59% | 41% | 80% | 20% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 46% | 54% | 77% | 23% | |
| 20% | 80% | 48% | 52% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 92% | 8% | 98% | 2% | |
| 73% | 27% | 86% | 14% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
2-2
35%
X-2
19%
X-X
13%
1-1
12%
X-1
8%
1-X
4%
2-X
4%
1-2
2%
2-1
2%
Correct Score
0-1
10.8%
1-1
10.5%
0-2
9.7%
1-2
9.3%
0-0
6.8%
1-0
6.4%
0-3
5.6%
2-1
5.2%
1-3
5.0%
2-2
4.4%
2-0
3.1%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score