Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla 3-2 Score & Prediction Review
Premier League - Season 2025/2026 (Round 17)
3–2
On these chances Ceramica Cleopatra would usually take 2.1 points and Ghazl El Mehalla 0.7; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Ceramica Cleopatra.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla stats: how the match was played
Premier League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Ceramica Cleopatra had more than twice the shots on target
Ceramica Cleopatra
Ghazl El Mehalla
8
Shots on target
3
2
Big chances
1
3
Corners
3
4
Yellow cards
1
62%
Possession
38%
Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Premier League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Ceramica Cleopatra to win
CorrectOur track record
In 3,440 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 49.4% of the time (bookmakers said 50.4%).
Our model’s pick
No, not both
WrongOur track record
In 5,613 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 57.0% of the time (bookmakers said 57.7%).
Our model’s pick
Under 2.5 goals
WrongOur track record
In 3,055 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.7% of the time (bookmakers said 62.5%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
WrongOur track record
In 1,741 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 80–85% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 80.4% of the time (bookmakers said 81.3%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Ceramica Cleopatra ahead at half-time.
Our track record
In 517 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 36.2% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 38.9% than to our 45–50%.
Our model’s pick
Ceramica Cleopatra 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 3,423 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 64.0% of the time (bookmakers said 64.0%).
Our model’s pick
Ghazl El Mehalla 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 2,567 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 75.1% of the time (bookmakers said 76.5%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla 3-2 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Ceramica Cleopatra vs Ghazl El Mehalla. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
1X 76%
BTTS*
No 56%
Correct Score
1-0 15%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 61%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 72%
Winner
1X 76%
BTTS*
No 56%
Correct Score
1-0 15%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 61%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 72%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 35% | 65% | 61% | 39% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 72% | 28% | 91% | 9% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27% | 73% | 62% | 38% | |
| 44% | 56% | 79% | 21% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85% | 15% | 96% | 4% | |
| 94% | 6% | 99% | 1% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
27%
X-X
20%
X-1
18%
2-2
12%
X-2
9%
1-X
5%
2-X
4%
2-1
3%
1-2
1%
Correct Score
1-0
14.7%
1-1
13.1%
0-0
11.3%
2-0
9.5%
2-1
9.3%
0-1
9.1%
1-2
5.8%
3-0
4.3%
0-2
3.8%
3-1
3.6%
2-2
3.6%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score