2. Leagues
  3. Premier League
  4. ENPPI vs Pyramids FC

ENPPI vs Pyramids FC 1-2 Score & Prediction Review

Premier League - Season 2026/2027 (Round 5)

Fair result
ENPPIENPPI

1–2

Pyramids FCPyramids FC
0.9Chances (xG)1.4

On these chances ENPPI would usually take 1.0 points and Pyramids FC 1.8; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Pyramids FC.

ENPPI −1.0 pts vs chancesPyramids FC +1.3 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

ENPPI vs Pyramids FC stats: how the match was played

Premier League

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Level on shots on target

ENPPI

Pyramids FC

4

Shots on target

5

0

Big chances

2

3

Corners

6

1

Yellow cards

6

36%

Possession

65%

The match between ENPPI and Pyramids FC ended 1-2. Our AI model correctly predicted an Pyramids FC win with 54% confidence before kick-off. Overall a solid read on this match, with 2 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Full-Time Result & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: ENPPI – Al Mokawloon prediction & betting tips (Oct 19, 2026).

ENPPI vs Pyramids FC — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Premier League

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Pyramids FC to win

Correct
Our model 54%Bookmakers 72%

Our track record

In 2,495 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 54.6% of the time (bookmakers said 55.1%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

No, not both

Wrong
Our model 61%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 2,480 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 62.5% of the time (bookmakers said 61.6%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 63%Bookmakers 51%

Our track record

In 3,115 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.5% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 82%Bookmakers 74%

Our track record

In 1,741 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 80–85% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 80.4% of the time (bookmakers said 81.3%).

First Half Result →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Correct

The bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Pyramids FC ahead at half-time.

Our model 47%Bookmakers 41%

Our track record

In 531 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 35.8% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 38.9% than to our 45–50%.

ENPPI Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

ENPPI 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 84%Bookmakers 88%

Our track record

In 395 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 80–85% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 80.5% of the time (bookmakers said 80.6%).

Pyramids FC Goals →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Pyramids FC 0–1 goals

Wrong

The bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Pyramids FC 2+ goals.

Our model 57%Bookmakers 40%

Our track record

In 632 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 45.1% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 44.7% than to our 55–60%.

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

ENPPI vs Pyramids FC 1-2 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for ENPPI vs Pyramids FC. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
Premier League - Egypt
ENPPIENPPI1
Pyramids FCPyramids FC2

Winner

2 54%

BTTS*

No 61%

Correct Score

0-1 16%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

under 63%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 72%

Full Time

118%
X28%
254%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT35%65%63%37%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT72%28%90%10%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
ENPPI51%49%84%16%
Pyramids FC24%76%57%43%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
ENPPI96%4%99%1%
Pyramids FC82%18%94%6%

1st Half

116%
X47%
237%

1st Score

127%
X12%
262%

Half Time/Full Time

2-2

33%

X-2

20%

X-X

19%

1-1

9%

X-1

7%

1-X

5%

2-X

4%

1-2

2%

2-1

1%

Correct Score

0-1

15.9%

1-1

12.3%

0-2

12.3%

0-0

11.6%

1-2

8.7%

1-0

7.7%

0-3

5.2%

2-1

4.3%

1-3

4.1%

2-2

3.5%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: ENPPI – Al Mokawloon prediction & betting tips (Oct 19, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores