Fast starters
8/10Ceramica Cleopatra scored first in 8 of their last 10 (league 43%).
Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra Prediction, Stats & Betting Tips
Premier League - Season 2026/2027 (Round 6)
Riding their luck
Pyramids FC are taking more points than their chances usually bring
+6points more than their chances usually bring in their last 10
85% of teams this far ahead of their chances got fewer points in their next 10 games.
Bookmakers: Pyramids FC 62% to winCeramica Cleopatra 13%
Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra score prediction
Premier League
The goals we expect each side to score, not an exact score: built from both teams' chances, the bookmakers' view and real goals here.
Pyramids FC expected to create clearly more
2.3 goals in total, a little over the Premier League average of 2.1.
goals expected
Pyramids FC1.5Ceramica Cleopatra0.9Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
We look at how many chances each team has created and allowed in its recent games in this league, what the bookmakers expected from those games, and the goals actually scored. Then we compare that with how many goals home and away teams usually score here.
Does it work? Since July 2025, our numbers have been 7% closer to the real goals than just using the league average.
How we measure →Get our AI football prediction and stats for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: our model’s probabilities next to the bookmakers’ odds in each market, how often similar predictions came true, and both teams’ recent form.
Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Premier League
For each market: our model’s probability for this match, the bookmakers’ probability from the current odds (margin removed), whether the two agree, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months. When they disagree, the bookmakers’ number has usually been the better guide.
How to read it
our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers
Our model’s pick
Pyramids FC to win
Our model 53%Bookmakers 62%
Our track record
In 2,431 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 54.6% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).
Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers
Our model’s pick
No, not both
Our model 52%Bookmakers 52%
Our track record
In 6,328 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).
Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Disagrees with bookmakers
Our model’s pick
Under 2.5 goals
Our model 57%Bookmakers 49%
Our track record
In 792 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 47.3% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.4% than to our 55–60%.
Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
Our model 78%Bookmakers 72%
Our track record
In 3,613 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 76.2% of the time (bookmakers said 76.3%).
First Half Result →Disagrees with bookmakers
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
Our model 46%Bookmakers 40%
Our track record
In 501 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 37.1% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 38.9% than to our 45–50%.
Pyramids FC Goals →Disagrees with bookmakers
Our model’s pick
Pyramids FC 0–1 goals
Our model 55%Bookmakers 44%
Our track record
In 1,810 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 41.8% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 43.8% than to our 50–55%.
Ceramica Cleopatra Goals →Agrees with bookmakers
Our model’s pick
Ceramica Cleopatra 0–1 goals
Our model 80%Bookmakers 80%
Our track record
In 1,484 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 80–85% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 78.6% of the time (bookmakers said 80.6%).
Odds can still move before kick-off. The track record uses closing odds.
Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra — AI Prediction & Probabilities by Market
Below are our AI-generated match predictions for Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra. Each market shows the probability of each outcome based on our model's analysis of team form, historical data and current season performance.
Pyramids FC–
Ceramica Cleopatra–Winner
1 53%
BTTS*
No 52%
Correct Score
1-0 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 57%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 68%
Pyramids FC–Ceramica Cleopatra–Winner
1 53%
BTTS*
No 52%
Correct Score
1-0 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 57%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 68%
Full Time
153%
X27%
220%
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 30% | 70% | 57% | 43% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 68% | 32% | 88% | 12% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22% | 78% | 55% | 45% |
| 45% | 55% | 80% | 20% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81% | 19% | 94% | 6% |
| 95% | 5% | 99% | 1% |
1st Half
137%
X46%
217%
1st Score
160%
X10%
230%
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
31%
X-1
19%
X-X
19%
2-2
10%
X-2
7%
1-X
5%
2-X
5%
2-1
3%
1-2
1%
Correct Score
1-0
13.8%
1-1
13.0%
2-0
10.5%
2-1
10.4%
0-0
9.6%
0-1
7.0%
1-2
4.9%
3-0
4.8%
3-1
4.7%
2-2
4.2%
0-2
3.2%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score
Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: the stats that stand out
Premier League
Where each side is most unusual compared with the rest of the league: clean sheets, scoring first, wins as favourites and more.
How to read it
the teamleague averageshare of games, 0 to 100%Ceramica Cleopatra: fast starters · Pyramids FC: banker as favourites and always on the scoresheet
8/10Banker as favourites
7/9Pyramids FC won 7 of 9 as favourites (league 47%).
Always on the scoresheet
1/10Pyramids FC failed to score in only 1 of their last 10 (league 32%).
Calculated by MyGameOdds
How it works
We compare each team's last 10 games in this competition with how often the same thing happens across the whole league (last 12 months). A fact only shows when the team is noticeably different from a typical team. For example, if teams here score first in half their games, a team needs 7 or more out of 10 (or 3 or fewer). We show up to three facts, the most unusual first, never two about the same thing. They describe what happened, not a forecast.
How we measure →Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: attack vs defence
Premier League
Both sides' chances created and allowed a game, next to the rest of the league, measured with our own xG.
How to read it
other Premier League teamsleague averagelast 10 games↑ Fewer chances allowed (xGA a game)
More chances created (xG a game) →
- Pyramids FC: good attack, good defence (1.26 xG, 0.74 xGA a game)
- Ceramica Cleopatra: weak attack, good defence (1.05 xG, 0.99 xGA)
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
xG is our estimate of how many goals a team's chances were worth, from the shots in each match; xGA is the same for the chances it allowed. The dashed lines are the average of the teams shown. A team close to a line is about average. Teams with fewer than 5 games here aren't in the chart yet.
How we measure →Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra form and luck check
Premier League
Whether each side is taking more or fewer points than its chances usually bring.
How to read it
what their chances usually bringoutside the normal range (±4)last 10 Premier League gamesPyramids FC are taking more points than their chances usually bring
- Pyramids FCBookmakers: 62% to win today.Clinical · +4 goals+5.6
- Ceramica CleopatraBookmakers: 13% to win today.Clinical · +4 goals+3.3
Last 5 matches
Pyramids FCW
W
W
W
W
Ceramica CleopatraW
W
W
W
L
W
D
L
Strength rank: Pyramids FC 2nd of 20 · Ceramica Cleopatra 5th of 20
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
For each of a team's last 10 games, we work out how many points a team usually gets from a game with those chances (xG) for and against, add them up and compare with the points it actually got. We do the same for goals. Strong teams often get a bit more than their chances suggest, so we compare each team with sides of similar strength in this league. That way nobody is flagged just for being good.
We flag a team when the gap is 4 points or more (or 3 goals or more). If some games have no xG data, we use the ones that do.
Does it mean anything? 85% of teams 4+ points ahead of their chances got fewer points in their next 10 games, and 83% of teams 4+ points behind got more. Bookmakers already expect these gaps to even out, so it's a fan's read, not a betting edge.
Strength rank: we rank this season's 20 teams by how much better their attack is than their defence, using chances (xG), the odds and goals. Does it work? Over the first half of a season, this rank predicted the second half better than the league table did.
How we measure →Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra: Over 2.5 & BTTS?
Premier League
How often each side's recent league games had over 2.5 goals and both teams scoring.
How to read it
a game where it happenedleague averagelast 10 Premier League gamesBTTS = both teams scoredCeramica Cleopatra games go over 2.5 goals less often than the Premier League average (36%), Pyramids FC games more often.
Over 2.5 goalsleague 36%
Pyramids FC5 of 10
Ceramica Cleopatra2 of 10
BTTSleague 49%
Pyramids FC4 of 10
Ceramica Cleopatra4 of 10
Calculated by MyGameOdds
How it works
For each team we take its last 10 games in this competition from the past 12 months (fewer if it hasn't played 10) and count how many went over 2.5 goals and how many had both teams scoring. The league figure uses all 274 games played here in the last 12 months.
How we measure →Pyramids FC vs Ceramica Cleopatra corners, cards and goal times
Premier League
Each side's corners and cards a game, and when it scores and concedes, from its recent league games.
How to read it
league averagelast 10 in the league · corners and cards per gameGoal times close to the Premier League average
Pyramids FC
Ceramica Cleopatra
5.6
Corners won · league 4.5
4.2
3.6
Corners conceded · league 4.5
4.0
2.4
Cards · league 2.0
1.4
2.1
Opponents' cards · league 2.0
2.4
44%
Goals before half-time · league 44%
43%
17%
Goals after 75' · league 28%
14%
67%
Conceded before half-time · league 44%
29%
17%
Conceded after 75' · league 28%
43%
Calculated by MyGameOdds
How it works
We use each team's last 10 games here. Corners and cards only count games where those stats were recorded, and goal times only count games with reliable goal minutes, so some teams have fewer than 10. We compare with the whole league over the last 12 months.
How we measure →Our prediction record
Our last 5 predictions in each team’s matches, by market.
Full-Time Result
Pyramids FC5/5
Ceramica Cleopatra2/5
Both Teams to Score
Pyramids FC4/5
Ceramica Cleopatra3/5
Over/Under 2.5 Goals
Pyramids FC3/5
Ceramica Cleopatra3/5
Over/Under 3.5 Goals
Pyramids FC5/5
Ceramica Cleopatra4/5
First Half Result
Pyramids FC2/5
Ceramica Cleopatra2/5
Correct Score
Pyramids FC1/5
Ceramica Cleopatra0/5
correct predictionwrong prediction