2. Leagues
  3. Superliga
  4. FCSB vs Petrolul 52

FCSB vs Petrolul 52 2-2 Score & Prediction Review

Superliga - Season 2026/2027 (Round 9)

Robbed

FCSB drew despite more chances

FCSBFCSB

2–2

Petrolul 52Petrolul 52
3.7Chances (xG)1.0

On these chances FCSB would usually take 2.6 points and Petrolul 52 0.3; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: FCSB.

FCSB −1.6 pts vs chancesPetrolul 52 +0.7 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

FCSB vs Petrolul 52 stats: how the match was played

Superliga

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

FCSB had more than twice the shots on target

FCSB

Petrolul 52

10

Shots on target

4

6

Big chances

2

10

Corners

4

3

Yellow cards

1

58%

Possession

42%

The match between FCSB and Petrolul 52 ended 2-2. Our AI model predicted a FCSB win at 67% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Overall a solid read on this match, with 2 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Both Teams To Score & Over/Under 2.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Voluntari – FCSB prediction & betting tips (Oct 19, 2026).

FCSB vs Petrolul 52 — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Superliga

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

FCSB to win

Wrong
Our model 67%Bookmakers 70%

Our track record

In 616 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 70.5% of the time (bookmakers said 70.8%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Correct
Our model 59%Bookmakers 50%

Our track record

In 5,732 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 56.8% of the time (bookmakers said 57.7%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Correct
Our model 61%Bookmakers 60%

Our track record

In 3,115 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.5% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 63%Bookmakers 63%

Our track record

In 2,403 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.6% of the time (bookmakers said 62.8%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

FCSB ahead at half-time

Correct
Our model 48%Bookmakers 51%

Our track record

In 4,247 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 47.8% of the time (bookmakers said 47.3%).

FCSB Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

FCSB 2+ goals

Correct
Our model 64%Bookmakers 66%

Our track record

In 3,463 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.8% of the time (bookmakers said 63.9%).

Petrolul 52 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Petrolul 52 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 80%Bookmakers 80%

Our track record

In 2,600 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 75.2% of the time (bookmakers said 76.4%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

FCSB vs Petrolul 52 2-2 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for FCSB vs Petrolul 52. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
Superliga - Romania
FCSBFCSB2
Petrolul 52Petrolul 522

Winner

1 67%

BTTS*

Yes 59%

Correct Score

2-1 12%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 61%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 53%

Full Time

167%
X18%
214%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT18%82%39%61%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT53%47%76%24%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
FCSB11%89%36%64%
Petrolul 5249%51%80%20%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
FCSB64%36%83%17%
Petrolul 5295%5%99%1%

1st Half

148%
X37%
214%

1st Score

169%
X4%
226%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

41%

X-1

21%

X-X

11%

2-2

7%

X-2

5%

1-X

4%

2-1

4%

2-X

4%

1-2

2%

Correct Score

2-1

11.7%

1-0

10.4%

2-0

10.2%

1-1

8.7%

3-1

7.3%

3-0

7.1%

1-2

4.6%

2-2

4.6%

0-0

4.3%

3-2

4.1%

0-1

3.7%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Voluntari – FCSB prediction & betting tips (Oct 19, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores