Gnistan vs TPS 1-1 Score & Prediction Review

Veikkausliiga - Season 2026 (Round 22)

Robbed

Gnistan drew despite more chances

GnistanGnistan

1–1

TPSTPS
2.6Chances (xG)1.4

On these chances Gnistan would usually take 2.1 points and TPS 0.7; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: Gnistan.

Gnistan −1.1 pts vs chancesTPS +0.3 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Gnistan vs TPS stats: how the match was played

Veikkausliiga

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Level on shots on target

Gnistan

TPS

5

Shots on target

5

2

Big chances

2

11

Corners

4

1

Yellow cards

2

47%

Possession

53%

The match between Gnistan and TPS ended 1-1. Our AI model predicted a Gnistan win at 47% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Our model got 1 out of 4 markets right, correctly predicting Both Teams To Score — a reminder that football can be unpredictable, but the data continues to sharpen future predictions.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: KuPS – Gnistan prediction & betting tips (Oct 29, 2026).

Gnistan vs TPS — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Veikkausliiga

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Gnistan to win

Wrong
Our model 47%Bookmakers 48%

Our track record

In 3,513 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 49.3% of the time (bookmakers said 50.5%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Correct
Our model 63%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 2,480 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 62.5% of the time (bookmakers said 61.6%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 63%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 3,115 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.5% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 60%Bookmakers 58%

Our track record

In 937 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 60.1% of the time (bookmakers said 60.1%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Correct
Our model 40%Bookmakers 39%

Our track record

In 2,043 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 40.3% of the time (bookmakers said 41.2%).

Gnistan Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Gnistan 2+ goals

Wrong
Our model 51%Bookmakers 54%

Our track record

In 2,827 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.4% of the time (bookmakers said 58.6%).

TPS Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

TPS 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 62%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 2,695 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.1% of the time (bookmakers said 63.8%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Gnistan vs TPS 1-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Gnistan vs TPS. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
GnistanGnistan1
TPSTPS1

Winner

1X 70%

BTTS*

Yes 63%

Correct Score

1-1 10%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 63%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

over 50%

Full Time

147%
X23%
230%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT17%83%37%63%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT50%50%76%24%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Gnistan21%79%49%51%
TPS32%68%62%38%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Gnistan74%26%90%10%
TPS84%16%94%6%

1st Half

135%
X40%
225%

1st Score

157%
X4%
238%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

27%

X-1

16%

2-2

16%

X-X

13%

X-2

10%

1-X

5%

2-X

5%

1-2

3%

2-1

3%

Correct Score

1-1

9.8%

2-1

9.5%

1-0

7.6%

1-2

7.2%

2-2

6.5%

2-0

6.3%

3-1

5.8%

0-1

5.4%

0-0

4.4%

3-2

4.1%

0-2

4.0%

3-0

3.7%

1-3

3.7%

2-3

3.1%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: KuPS – Gnistan prediction & betting tips (Oct 29, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores