- Home
- Nasaf vs Tractor Sazi
Nasaf vs Tractor Sazi 0-1 Score & Prediction Review
AFC Champions League Elite - Season 2025/2026 West (Group Stage) (Round 5)
0–1
On these chances Nasaf would usually take 1.1 points and Tractor Sazi 1.7; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Tractor Sazi.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Nasaf vs Tractor Sazi stats: how the match was played
AFC Champions League Elite
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Tractor Sazi had more than twice the shots on target
Nasaf
Tractor Sazi
3
Shots on target
8
2
Big chances
1
3
Corners
4
1
Yellow cards
0
55%
Possession
45%
Nasaf vs Tractor Sazi — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · AFC Champions League Elite
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Tractor Sazi to win
CorrectOur track record
In 2,100 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 43.5% of the time (bookmakers said 44.0%).
Our model’s pick
No, not both
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Yes, both score.
Our track record
In 3,124 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 46.6% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.4% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Under 2.5 goals
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Over 2.5 goals.
Our track record
In 2,837 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 44.1% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.2% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,655 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 76.0% of the time (bookmakers said 76.2%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
WrongOur track record
In 6,658 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.2%).
Our model’s pick
Nasaf 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 2,675 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 69.0% of the time (bookmakers said 67.6%).
Our model’s pick
Tractor Sazi 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 2,649 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.3% of the time (bookmakers said 63.8%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Nasaf vs Tractor Sazi 0-1 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Nasaf vs Tractor Sazi. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
No 51%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 53%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 65%
Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
No 51%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 53%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 65%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 28% | 72% | 53% | 47% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 65% | 35% | 86% | 14% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32% | 68% | 66% | 34% | |
| 32% | 69% | 65% | 35% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 87% | 13% | 96% | 4% | |
| 86% | 14% | 95% | 5% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
24%
2-2
18%
X-X
17%
X-1
16%
X-2
12%
1-X
4%
2-X
4%
1-2
2%
2-1
2%
Correct Score
1-1
12.2%
0-1
10.3%
1-0
10.1%
1-2
8.3%
0-0
8.1%
2-1
7.6%
0-2
6.6%
2-0
6.2%
2-2
4.6%
1-3
3.3%
3-1
3.2%
3-0
3.1%
0-3
3.0%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score