1. Anyang vs Gangwon

Anyang vs Gangwon 2-1 Score & Prediction Review

K-League 1 - Season 2026 (Round 20)

Fair result
AnyangAnyang

2–1

GangwonGangwon
1.4Chances (xG)1.5

On these chances Anyang would usually take 1.3 points and Gangwon 1.4; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Gangwon.

Anyang +1.7 pts vs chancesGangwon −1.4 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Anyang vs Gangwon stats: how the match was played

K-League 1

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Gangwon had more than twice the shots on target

Anyang

Gangwon

3

Shots on target

7

3

Big chances

1

2

Corners

10

2

Yellow cards

0

40%

Possession

60%

The match between Anyang and Gangwon ended 2-1. Our AI model predicted an Gangwon win at 39% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Our model got 1 out of 4 markets right, correctly predicting Over/Under 3.5 Goals — a reminder that football can be unpredictable, but the data continues to sharpen future predictions.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Seoul – Gangwon prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Anyang vs Gangwon — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · K-League 1

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Gangwon to win

Wrong
Our model 40%Bookmakers 47%

Our track record

In 2,116 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 43.6% of the time (bookmakers said 44.0%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

No, not both

Wrong
Our model 52%Bookmakers 54%

Our track record

In 6,501 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 60%Bookmakers 59%

Our track record

In 5,337 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 58.4% of the time (bookmakers said 59.1%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 81%Bookmakers 80%

Our track record

In 1,741 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 80–85% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 80.4% of the time (bookmakers said 81.3%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Wrong
Our model 50%Bookmakers 46%

Our track record

In 1,249 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 54.1% of the time (bookmakers said 51.8%).

Anyang Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Anyang 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 73%Bookmakers 77%

Our track record

In 1,588 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.5% of the time (bookmakers said 72.0%).

Gangwon Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Gangwon 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 66%Bookmakers 60%

Our track record

In 3,280 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.3% of the time (bookmakers said 67.7%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Anyang vs Gangwon 2-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Anyang vs Gangwon. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
AnyangAnyang2
GangwonGangwon1

Winner

12 70%

BTTS*

No 52%

Correct Score

1-1 14%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

under 60%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 70%

Full Time

131%
X30%
239%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT33%67%60%40%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT70%30%91%9%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Anyang36%64%73%27%
Gangwon30%70%66%34%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Anyang91%9%98%2%
Gangwon88%12%97%3%

1st Half

121%
X50%
229%

1st Score

139%
X11%
251%

Half Time/Full Time

X-X

21%

2-2

21%

X-2

17%

1-1

15%

X-1

12%

1-X

5%

2-X

5%

1-2

2%

2-1

2%

Correct Score

1-1

13.8%

0-1

12.3%

0-0

10.6%

1-0

10.5%

1-2

8.7%

2-1

7.1%

0-2

7.1%

2-0

5.3%

2-2

4.5%

1-3

3.2%

0-3

3.1%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Seoul – Gangwon prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores