2. Leagues
  3. Pro League
  4. Zulte-Waregem vs Genk

Zulte-Waregem vs Genk 2-1 Score & Prediction Review

Pro League - Season 2026/2027 (Round 1)

Fair result
Zulte-WaregemZulte-Waregem

2–1

GenkGenk
1.0Chances (xG)1.1

On these chances Zulte-Waregem would usually take 1.3 points and Genk 1.4; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Genk.

Zulte-Waregem +1.7 pts vs chancesGenk −1.4 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Zulte-Waregem vs Genk stats: how the match was played

Pro League

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Level on shots on target

Zulte-Waregem

Genk

5

Shots on target

4

0

Big chances

2

6

Corners

3

1

Yellow cards

4

37%

Possession

63%

The match between Zulte-Waregem and Genk ended 2-1. Our AI model predicted an Genk win at 38% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Overall a solid read on this match, with 3 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Both Teams To Score, Over/Under 2.5 Goals & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Genk – Standard Liège prediction & betting tips (Oct 25, 2026).

Zulte-Waregem vs Genk — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Pro League

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Genk to win

Wrong
Our model 38%Bookmakers 45%

Our track record

In 2,116 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 43.6% of the time (bookmakers said 44.0%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Correct
Our model 61%Bookmakers 58%

Our track record

In 2,480 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 62.5% of the time (bookmakers said 61.6%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Correct
Our model 58%Bookmakers 56%

Our track record

In 5,337 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 58.4% of the time (bookmakers said 59.1%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 64%Bookmakers 68%

Our track record

In 2,403 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.6% of the time (bookmakers said 62.8%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Wrong
Our model 39%Bookmakers 40%

Our track record

In 2,043 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 40.3% of the time (bookmakers said 41.2%).

Zulte-Waregem Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Zulte-Waregem 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 58%Bookmakers 63%

Our track record

In 3,480 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.8% of the time (bookmakers said 61.1%).

Genk Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Genk 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 58%Bookmakers 52%

Our track record

In 1,616 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.6% of the time (bookmakers said 61.0%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Zulte-Waregem vs Genk 2-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Zulte-Waregem vs Genk. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
Pro League - Belgium
Zulte-WaregemZulte-Waregem2
GenkGenk1

Winner

12 75%

BTTS*

Yes 61%

Correct Score

1-1 11%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 58%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 54%

Full Time

137%
X25%
238%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT20%80%42%58%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT54%46%79%21%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Zulte-Waregem27%73%58%42%
Genk27%73%58%42%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Zulte-Waregem82%18%93%7%
Genk81%19%93%7%

1st Half

129%
X39%
232%

1st Score

143%
X5%
252%

Half Time/Full Time

2-2

23%

1-1

19%

X-X

14%

X-2

13%

X-1

12%

2-X

7%

1-X

6%

1-2

3%

2-1

3%

Correct Score

1-1

11.5%

1-2

8.7%

2-1

8.3%

0-1

7.3%

1-0

7.1%

2-2

6.6%

0-2

5.5%

0-0

5.3%

2-0

5.2%

1-3

4.2%

3-1

4.2%

2-3

3.4%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Genk – Standard Liège prediction & betting tips (Oct 25, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores