- Home
- Chengdu Rongcheng vs Wuhan Three Towns
Chengdu Rongcheng vs Wuhan Three Towns 1-1 Score & Prediction Review
Super League - Season 2026 (Round 21)
Chengdu Rongcheng drew despite more chances
1–1
On these chances Chengdu Rongcheng would usually take 2.0 points and Wuhan Three Towns 0.9; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: Chengdu Rongcheng.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Chengdu Rongcheng vs Wuhan Three Towns stats: how the match was played
Super League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Chengdu Rongcheng had clearly more shots on target
Chengdu Rongcheng
Wuhan Three Towns
9
Shots on target
6
5
Big chances
3
9
Corners
3
1
Yellow cards
2
59%
Possession
41%
Chengdu Rongcheng vs Wuhan Three Towns — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Super League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Chengdu Rongcheng to win
WrongOur track record
In 325 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 80.0% of the time (bookmakers said 76.3%).
Our model’s pick
No, not both
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Yes, both score.
Our track record
In 3,139 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 46.5% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.4% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
WrongOur track record
In 5,191 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 57.0% of the time (bookmakers said 56.4%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,986 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.3% of the time (bookmakers said 66.8%).
Our model’s pick
Chengdu Rongcheng ahead at half-time
WrongOur track record
In 1,249 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 54.1% of the time (bookmakers said 51.8%).
Our model’s pick
Chengdu Rongcheng 2+ goals
WrongOur track record
In 3,463 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.8% of the time (bookmakers said 63.9%).
Our model’s pick
Wuhan Three Towns 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 600 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 85–90% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 85.2% of the time (bookmakers said 85.0%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Chengdu Rongcheng vs Wuhan Three Towns 1-1 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Chengdu Rongcheng vs Wuhan Three Towns. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
1 70%
BTTS*
No 53%
Correct Score
2-0 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 55%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 57%
Winner
1 70%
BTTS*
No 53%
Correct Score
2-0 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 55%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 57%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 23% | 77% | 45% | 55% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 57% | 43% | 78% | 22% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13% | 87% | 38% | 62% | |
| 57% | 43% | 86% | 14% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 64% | 36% | 82% | 18% | |
| 97% | 3% | 99% | 1% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
50%
X-1
19%
X-X
9%
2-2
6%
X-2
4%
2-1
4%
1-X
3%
2-X
3%
1-2
1%
Correct Score
2-0
12.4%
1-0
12.4%
2-1
9.6%
3-0
8.7%
1-1
8.6%
3-1
6.6%
0-0
6.1%
0-1
4.2%
2-2
3.4%
1-2
3.1%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score