Lyngby vs AaB 2-1 Score & Prediction Review

Superliga - Season 2022/2023 (Round 9)

Fair result
LyngbyLyngby

2–1

AaBAaB
1.6Chances (xG)2.0

On these chances Lyngby would usually take 1.2 points and AaB 1.6; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: AaB.

Lyngby +1.8 pts vs chancesAaB −1.6 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Lyngby vs AaB stats: how the match was played

Superliga

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

AaB had clearly more shots on target

Lyngby

AaB

5

Shots on target

7

2

Big chances

0

6

Corners

7

0

Yellow cards

1

45%

Possession

55%

The match between Lyngby and AaB ended 2-1. Our AI model predicted an AaB win at 38% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Overall a solid read on this match, with 2 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Both Teams To Score & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Lyngby – Randers prediction & betting tips (Oct 30, 2026).

Lyngby vs AaB — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Superliga

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

AaB to win

Wrong
Our model 38%Bookmakers 46%

Our track record

In 2,085 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 43.7% of the time (bookmakers said 43.9%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Correct
Our model 52%Bookmakers 54%

Our track record

In 6,479 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 2.5 goals

Wrong

The bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Over 2.5 goals.

Our model 53%Bookmakers 49%

Our track record

In 2,847 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 44.2% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.2% than to our 50–55%.

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 74%Bookmakers 72%

Our track record

In 4,543 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 72.2% of the time (bookmakers said 71.4%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Correct
Our model 41%Bookmakers 42%

Our track record

In 6,629 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.4% of the time (bookmakers said 44.1%).

Lyngby Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Lyngby 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 66%Bookmakers 68%

Our track record

In 2,666 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 69.1% of the time (bookmakers said 67.6%).

AaB Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

AaB 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 64%Bookmakers 54%

Our track record

In 2,642 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.4% of the time (bookmakers said 63.7%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Lyngby vs AaB 2-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Lyngby vs AaB. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
LyngbyLyngby2
AaBAaB1

Winner

12 73%

BTTS*

Yes 52%

Correct Score

1-1 13%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

under 53%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 64%

Full Time

135%
X27%
238%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT28%72%53%47%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT64%36%86%14%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Lyngby32%68%66%34%
AaB30%70%64%36%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Lyngby0%0%0%0%
AaB0%0%0%0%

1st Half

130%
X40%
229%

1st Score

146%
X8%
246%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

22%

2-2

21%

X-X

15%

X-1

13%

X-2

13%

1-X

6%

2-X

6%

1-2

3%

2-1

3%

Correct Score

1-1

12.7%

0-1

10.2%

1-0

9.7%

0-0

8.1%

1-2

8.1%

2-1

7.7%

0-2

6.7%

2-0

5.8%

2-2

5.2%

1-3

3.5%

3-1

3.2%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Lyngby – Randers prediction & betting tips (Oct 30, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores