1. AGF vs Brøndby

AGF vs Brøndby 3-3 Score & Prediction Review

Superliga - Season 2022/2023 (Round 10)

Fair result
AGFAGF

3–3

BrøndbyBrøndby
1.6Chances (xG)1.2

On these chances AGF would usually take 1.7 points and Brøndby 1.1; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: AGF.

AGF −0.7 pts vs chancesBrøndby −0.1 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

AGF vs Brøndby stats: how the match was played

Superliga

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Brøndby had clearly more shots on target

AGF

Brøndby

3

Shots on target

5

2

Big chances

2

5

Corners

3

1

Yellow cards

3

1

Red cards

1

44%

Possession

56%

The match between AGF and Brøndby ended 3-3. Our AI model predicted a AGF win at 39% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Our model got 1 out of 4 markets right, correctly predicting Both Teams To Score — a reminder that football can be unpredictable, but the data continues to sharpen future predictions.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Brøndby – AGF prediction & betting tips (Nov 1, 2026).

AGF vs Brøndby — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Superliga

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

AGF to win

Wrong
Our model 39%Bookmakers 58%

Our track record

In 2,086 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 43.7% of the time (bookmakers said 43.9%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Correct
Our model 52%Bookmakers 55%

Our track record

In 6,482 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 2.5 goals

Wrong

The bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Over 2.5 goals.

Our model 53%Bookmakers 44%

Our track record

In 2,848 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 44.2% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.2% than to our 50–55%.

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 76%Bookmakers 66%

Our track record

In 3,642 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 76.2% of the time (bookmakers said 76.2%).

First Half Result →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Wrong

The bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: AGF ahead at half-time.

Our model 43%Bookmakers 40%

Our track record

In 2,263 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 36.5% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 37.3% than to our 40–45%.

AGF Goals →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

AGF 0–1 goals

Wrong

The bookmakers’ favourite was correct: AGF 2+ goals.

Our model 64%Bookmakers 44%

Our track record

In 395 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 43.0% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.9% than to our 60–65%.

Brøndby Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Brøndby 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 68%Bookmakers 74%

Our track record

In 3,290 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.2% of the time (bookmakers said 67.7%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

AGF vs Brøndby 3-3 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for AGF vs Brøndby. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
AGFAGF3
BrøndbyBrøndby3

Winner

12 73%

BTTS*

Yes 52%

Correct Score

1-1 13%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

under 53%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 66%

Full Time

139%
X27%
234%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT28%72%53%47%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT66%34%87%13%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
AGF29%71%64%36%
Brøndby33%67%68%32%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
AGF0%0%0%0%
Brøndby0%0%0%0%

1st Half

132%
X43%
225%

1st Score

148%
X8%
244%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

24%

2-2

18%

X-X

17%

X-1

14%

X-2

12%

1-X

5%

2-X

5%

2-1

3%

1-2

2%

Correct Score

1-1

13.1%

1-0

10.6%

0-1

9.5%

2-1

8.6%

0-0

8.3%

1-2

7.7%

2-0

6.7%

0-2

5.7%

2-2

5.1%

3-1

3.6%

3-0

3.0%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Brøndby – AGF prediction & betting tips (Nov 1, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores