Superliga de China Pronósticos, Estadísticas y Tips
La Superliga china es la primera división de China. La disputan 16 equipos con ascensos y descensos. Es conocida por sus fichajes de alto perfil y proyectos ambiciosos. El Guangzhou Evergrande Taobao FC figura entre los más laureados históricamente.
Predicciones de Super League por mercado
Temporada 2026 · Jornada 5 · Temporada regular
Resultado final (1x2)
58.5%
TASA DE ÉXITO PROM.
43.9% Promedio de cuotas
+33.2% Muy por encima
Ambos equipos marcan
60%
TASA DE ÉXITO PROM.
54.1% Promedio de cuotas
+10.8% Muy por encima
Más/Menos 2.5 goles
67.7%
TASA DE ÉXITO PROM.
53.7% Promedio de cuotas
+26.2% Muy por encima
Más/Menos 3.5 goles
58.5%
TASA DE ÉXITO PROM.
62% Promedio de cuotas
-5.7% Cerca del promedio
Resultado primera parte
43.1%
TASA DE ÉXITO PROM.
38.5% Promedio de cuotas
+12.1% Muy por encima
Marcador exacto
11%
TASA DE ÉXITO PROM.
Nuestro modelo de IA analiza los partidos de Super League en 6 mercados de apuestas — Resultado final (1x2), Ambos equipos marcan, Más/Menos 2.5 goles, Más/Menos 3.5 goles, Resultado primera parte, Marcador exacto. Cada tarjeta compara la precisión de nuestras predicciones con la probabilidad implícita derivada de las cuotas (mostrada como la línea discontinua). Las barras verdes significan que el modelo supera las expectativas de las casas de apuestas; las rojas indican que las casas de apuestas tienen actualmente una ventaja más precisa. En todos los mercados, nuestro modelo supera las líneas base de las casas de apuestas en 4 de 5 mercados esta temporada. Las predicciones de Resultado Exacto para Super League aciertan actualmente con un 11%.
Resultado final (1x2) es nuestro mercado de apuestas más fuerte para Super League esta temporada con 59% de precisión — un 33.2% por encima de la probabilidad implícita de las casas de apuestas del 43.9%. Esto significa que nuestro modelo de IA predice correctamente los resultados de Resultado final (1x2) a una tasa significativamente mayor que lo que sugieren las cuotas, convirtiéndolo en un mercado ideal para encontrar apuestas de valor en Super League.
Por otro lado, las predicciones de Más/Menos 3.5 goles están actualmente 5.7% por debajo de la precisión implícita de las casas de apuestas con 59%. Las cuotas son particularmente precisas para apuestas de Más/Menos 3.5 goles en Super League, por lo que los apostadores deben tener especial precaución y considerar combinar estas selecciones en combinadas en lugar de apuestas simples.
Los mercados restantes — Ambos equipos marcan, Más/Menos 2.5 goles, Resultado primera parte — rinden cerca o por encima de las expectativas de las casas de apuestas, ofreciendo ventajas moderadas para pronósticos de fútbol basados en datos de Super League.
Tips de Apuestas de Hoy para Super League China
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 25% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 23% | 77% | 55% | 45% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 41% | 59% | 74% | 26% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 52% | 48% | 63% | 37% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.1% | 11.9% | 9.3% | 8.8% | 8.0% | 7.6% |
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 25% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 23% | 77% | 55% | 45% |
 | 41% | 59% | 74% | 26% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 52% | 48% | 63% | 37% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.1% | 11.9% | 9.3% | 8.8% | 8.0% | 7.6% |
| 1 | 47% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 28% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Guoan | 23% | 77% | 52% | 48% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 36% | 64% | 67% | 33% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 8.9% | 8.6% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 47% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 28% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 23% | 77% | 52% | 48% |
 | 36% | 64% | 67% | 33% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 8.9% | 8.6% | 6.8% | 6.8% | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 47% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichuan | 21% | 79% | 50% | 50% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 34% | 66% | 66% | 34% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 53% | 47% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.8% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 7.0% | 7.0% | 6.4% |
| 1 | 47% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 21% | 79% | 50% | 50% |
 | 34% | 66% | 66% | 34% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 53% | 47% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.8% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 7.0% | 7.0% | 6.4% |
| 1 | 40% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 26% | 74% | 58% | 42% |
| Qingdao Youth Island | 30% | 70% | 63% | 37% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 59% | 41% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.8% | 9.0% | 8.7% | 8.3% | 7.8% | 6.1% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 40% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26% | 74% | 58% | 42% |
 | 30% | 70% | 63% | 37% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 59% | 41% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.8% | 9.0% | 8.7% | 8.3% | 7.8% | 6.1% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 63% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 17% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chongqing Tonglianglong FC | 15% | 85% | 42% | 58% |
| Sichuan | 50% | 50% | 80% | 20% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.6% | 11.0% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 7.5% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 63% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 17% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 15% | 85% | 42% | 58% |
| 50% | 50% | 80% | 20% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.6% | 11.0% | 9.7% | 9.4% | 7.5% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 57% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 23% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shandong Taishan | 15% | 85% | 40% | 60% |
| Shanghai Port | 39% | 61% | 68% | 32% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 33% | 67% | 45% | 55% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.7% | 8.8% | 7.2% | 7.0% | 6.9% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 57% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 23% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 15% | 85% | 40% | 60% |
 | 39% | 61% | 68% | 32% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 33% | 67% | 45% | 55% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 3-1 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.7% | 8.8% | 7.2% | 7.0% | 6.9% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 63% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 16% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yunnan Yukun | 15% | 85% | 42% | 58% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 49% | 51% | 80% | 20% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.2% | 10.6% | 9.9% | 9.9% | 7.4% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 63% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 16% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15% | 85% | 42% | 58% |
| 49% | 51% | 80% | 20% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.2% | 10.6% | 9.9% | 9.9% | 7.4% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 31% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 43% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 36% | 64% | 69% | 31% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 27% | 73% | 57% | 43% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 60% | 40% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 2-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.6% | 9.6% | 8.7% | 8.4% | 7.8% | 6.6% | 6.6% |
| 1 | 31% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 43% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 36% | 64% | 69% | 31% |
| 27% | 73% | 57% | 43% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 60% | 40% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 0-2 | 2-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.6% | 9.6% | 8.7% | 8.4% | 7.8% | 6.6% | 6.6% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hangzhou | 21% | 79% | 49% | 51% |
| Beijing Guoan | 34% | 66% | 65% | 35% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 51% | 49% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.0% | 9.3% | 8.3% | 7.1% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 21% | 79% | 49% | 51% |
| 34% | 66% | 65% | 35% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 51% | 49% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.0% | 9.3% | 8.3% | 7.1% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 45% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 30% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalian Zhixing | 24% | 76% | 57% | 43% |
| Henan Songshan Longmen | 35% | 65% | 69% | 31% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.0% | 10.3% | 9.1% | 8.0% | 7.6% | 7.1% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 45% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 30% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 24% | 76% | 57% | 43% |
 | 35% | 65% | 69% | 31% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.0% | 10.3% | 9.1% | 8.0% | 7.6% | 7.1% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 54% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 23% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 19% | 81% | 47% | 53% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 41% | 59% | 73% | 27% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 10.2% | 9.8% | 8.9% |
| 1 | 54% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 23% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 19% | 81% | 47% | 53% |
 | 41% | 59% | 73% | 27% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 10.2% | 9.8% | 8.9% |
| 1 | 39% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 38% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichuan | 27% | 73% | 57% | 43% |
| Beijing Guoan | 28% | 72% | 57% | 43% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 52% | 48% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 8.2% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 6.6% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 39% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 38% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27% | 73% | 57% | 43% |
| 28% | 72% | 57% | 43% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 52% | 48% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 8.2% | 8.1% | 7.0% | 6.6% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 34% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 41% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 30% | 70% | 62% | 38% |
| Hangzhou | 26% | 74% | 56% | 44% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.2% | 8.7% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 7.4% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 34% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 41% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30% | 70% | 62% | 38% |
| 26% | 74% | 56% | 44% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.2% | 8.7% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 7.4% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 67% | |
| X | 18% | |
| 2 | 14% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 12% | 88% | 35% | 65% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 52% | 48% | 81% | 19% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 38% | 62% | 50% | 50% |
| 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.9% | 9.5% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 7.3% | 6.9% |
| 1 | 67% | |
| X | 18% | |
| 2 | 14% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12% | 88% | 35% | 65% |
| 52% | 48% | 81% | 19% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 38% | 62% | 50% | 50% |
| 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.9% | 9.5% | 9.3% | 8.5% | 7.3% | 6.9% |
| 1 | 37% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 38% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 30% | 70% | 62% | 38% |
| Shandong Taishan | 30% | 70% | 61% | 39% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 47% | 53% | 58% | 42% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 8.8% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 37% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 38% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30% | 70% | 62% | 38% |
| 30% | 70% | 61% | 39% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 47% | 53% | 58% | 42% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 8.8% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 41% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 34% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Port | 26% | 74% | 56% | 44% |
| Chongqing Tonglianglong FC | 30% | 70% | 62% | 38% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 8.8% | 8.0% | 7.8% | 7.3% | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 41% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 34% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26% | 74% | 56% | 44% |
| 30% | 70% | 62% | 38% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 8.8% | 8.0% | 7.8% | 7.3% | 6.0% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 40% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Youth Island | 28% | 72% | 61% | 39% |
| Henan Songshan Longmen | 32% | 68% | 65% | 35% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 50% | 50% | 62% | 38% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.1% | 10.0% | 8.6% | 8.3% | 7.8% | 7.1% | 6.9% |
| 1 | 40% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28% | 72% | 61% | 39% |
| 32% | 68% | 65% | 35% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 50% | 50% | 62% | 38% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.1% | 10.0% | 8.6% | 8.3% | 7.8% | 7.1% | 6.9% |
| 1 | 58% | |
| X | 22% | |
| 2 | 20% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 17% | 83% | 44% | 56% |
| Dalian Zhixing | 44% | 56% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.3% | 10.0% | 9.8% | 9.0% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 58% | |
| X | 22% | |
| 2 | 20% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17% | 83% | 44% | 56% |
| 44% | 56% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.3% | 10.0% | 9.8% | 9.0% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 65% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 15% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 14% | 86% | 38% | 62% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 51% | 49% | 81% | 19% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 52% | 48% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.3% | 10.2% | 9.3% | 8.8% | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 65% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 15% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14% | 86% | 38% | 62% |
| 51% | 49% | 81% | 19% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 52% | 48% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.3% | 10.2% | 9.3% | 8.8% | 7.0% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 59% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 20% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 15% | 85% | 41% | 59% |
| Hangzhou | 43% | 57% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 52% | 48% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 9.9% | 9.1% | 9.0% | 6.6% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 59% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 20% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15% | 85% | 41% | 59% |
| 43% | 57% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 52% | 48% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 9.9% | 9.1% | 9.0% | 6.6% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 64% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 16% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Guoan | 13% | 87% | 37% | 63% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 48% | 52% | 78% | 22% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 38% | 62% | 50% | 50% |
| 2-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.5% | 9.4% | 9.1% | 9.0% | 7.2% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 64% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 16% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13% | 87% | 37% | 63% |
| 48% | 52% | 78% | 22% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 38% | 62% | 50% | 50% |
| 2-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.5% | 9.4% | 9.1% | 9.0% | 7.2% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 58% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Port | 17% | 83% | 43% | 57% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 44% | 56% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.0% | 9.7% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 58% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17% | 83% | 43% | 57% |
| 44% | 56% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.0% | 9.7% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 6.1% |
*La probabilidad de cada resultado previsto se expresa en porcentaje (%)
*BTTS - Ambos equipos marcan
Precisión de predicciones de Super League por equipo
Las estadísticas a continuación desglosan la precisión de nuestras predicciones de IA para cada mercado de apuestas de Super League a nivel de equipo. Para cada mercado, clasificamos los equipos donde nuestro modelo tiene mejor rendimiento — por ejemplo, Sichuan lidera las predicciones de Resultado final (1x2) con 100% de precisión (4 aciertos de 4 pronósticos). Las rachas de predicciones muestran qué equipos nuestro modelo ha estado acertando recientemente — una serie de predicciones correctas consecutivas (mostradas como puntos verdes) sugiere que el modelo tiene una buena lectura de los patrones actuales de ese equipo. Los equipos en racha en un mercado de alta ventaja como Resultado final (1x2) merecen especial atención para tu próxima apuesta en Super League.
La tabla de forma en la parte inferior destaca los equipos de Super League en mejor forma actual según resultados recientes — útil para identificar equipos en racha que pueden ofrecer valor adicional en apuestas.
Precisión de predicciones Resultado final (1x2) de Super League
Equipos con mejores predicciones
Sichuan
Yunnan Yukun
Shanghai PortRachas de predicciones
Shanghai PortSichuanYunnan YukunPrecisión de predicciones Ambos equipos marcan de Super League
Equipos con mejores predicciones
Beijing Guoan
Chengdu Rongcheng
Shandong TaishanRachas de predicciones
Beijing GuoanChengdu Rongcheng
Shanghai ShenhuaPrecisión de predicciones Más/Menos 2.5 goles de Super League
Equipos con mejores predicciones
Liaoning Tieren FCYunnan YukunShandong TaishanRachas de predicciones
Liaoning Tieren FC
Dalian Zhixing
Qingdao Youth IslandPrecisión de predicciones Más/Menos 3.5 goles de Super League
Equipos con mejores predicciones
Henan Songshan LongmenLiaoning Tieren FCBeijing GuoanRachas de predicciones
Henan Songshan LongmenLiaoning Tieren FCShanghai PortPrecisión de predicciones Resultado primera parte de Super League
Equipos con mejores predicciones
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Chongqing Tonglianglong FCYunnan YukunRachas de predicciones
Chongqing Tonglianglong FCTianjin Jinmen TigerShanghai PortEquipos de Super League en mejor forma
Chongqing Tonglianglong FCShanghai ShenhuaChengdu RongchengSuperliga de China Clasificación
Consulta la tabla de la liga actual, posiciones de equipos, puntos y forma. Haz clic para ver la clasificación completa con estadísticas detalladas.
#EQUIPO | PJ | PTS | V | E | P | GF | DG | FORMA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1  Chongqing Tonglianglong FC | 5 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 7:4 | +3 | G G E G E |
2  Chengdu Rongcheng | 4 | 10 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14:5 | +9 | G E G G |
3  Dalian Zhixing | 5 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10:10 | 0 | G G G P P |
4  Liaoning Tieren FC | 5 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 6:6 | 0 | E G G P P |
5  Yunnan Yukun | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9:5 | +4 | P G P G |