1. Cienciano vs Melgar

Cienciano vs Melgar 1-1 Score & Prediction Review

Copa Sudamericana - Season 2026 1st Round (Knock Out)

Cienciano vs Melgar stats: how the match was played

Copa Sudamericana

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Cienciano created more than twice the chances

Cienciano

Melgar

1.6

Chances (xG)

0.6

3

Shots on target

3

2

Big chances

0

6

Corners

3

3

Yellow cards

2

49%

Possession

51%

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →
The match between Cienciano and Melgar ended 1-1. Our AI model predicted a Cienciano win at 52% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Overall a solid read on this match, with 2 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Both Teams To Score & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.

Cienciano vs Melgar — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Copa Sudamericana

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Cienciano to win

Wrong
Our model 52%Bookmakers 42%

Our track record

In 2,470 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 54.7% of the time (bookmakers said 55.1%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Correct
Our model 55%Bookmakers 56%

Our track record

In 6,458 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.2% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 54%Bookmakers 51%

Our track record

In 5,151 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 57.1% of the time (bookmakers said 56.4%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 69%Bookmakers 72%

Our track record

In 3,955 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.4% of the time (bookmakers said 66.8%).

First Half Result →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Cienciano ahead at half-time

Wrong

The bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Draw at half-time.

Our model 40%Bookmakers 34%

Our track record

In 2,228 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 37.0% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 37.3% than to our 40–45%.

Cienciano Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Cienciano 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 50%Bookmakers 56%

Our track record

In 2,796 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.4% of the time (bookmakers said 58.7%).

Melgar Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Melgar 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 72%Bookmakers 68%

Our track record

In 3,353 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.7% of the time (bookmakers said 72.0%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Cienciano vs Melgar 1-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Cienciano vs Melgar. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
CiencianoCienciano1
MelgarMelgar1

Winner

1 52%

BTTS*

Yes 54%

Correct Score

1-1 11%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 54%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 59%

Full Time

152%
X24%
224%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT23%77%46%54%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT59%41%82%18%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Cienciano20%80%50%50%
Melgar39%61%72%28%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Cienciano76%24%90%10%
Melgar90%10%97%3%

1st Half

140%
X40%
220%

1st Score

160%
X6%
234%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

34%

X-1

18%

X-X

14%

2-2

12%

X-2

8%

1-X

5%

2-X

4%

2-1

3%

1-2

2%

Correct Score

1-1

11.3%

1-0

10.1%

2-1

10.1%

2-0

8.5%

0-1

6.4%

1-2

6.3%

0-0

6.1%

2-2

5.3%

3-1

5.3%

3-0

5.2%

0-2

3.5%

3-2

3.0%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores