2. Leagues
  3. K-League 1
  4. Daegu vs Anyang

Daegu vs Anyang 0-1 Score & Prediction Review

K-League 1 - Season 2025 (Round 5)

Fair result
DaeguDaegu

0–1

AnyangAnyang
1.8Chances (xG)1.4

On these chances Daegu would usually take 1.6 points and Anyang 1.1; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Daegu.

Daegu −1.6 pts vs chancesAnyang +1.9 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Daegu vs Anyang stats: how the match was played

K-League 1

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Daegu had clearly more shots on target

Daegu

Anyang

8

Shots on target

5

0

Big chances

2

14

Corners

3

3

Yellow cards

5

59%

Possession

41%

The match between Daegu and Anyang ended 0-1. Our AI model predicted a Daegu win at 39% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Overall a solid read on this match, with 2 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Over/Under 2.5 Goals & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Anyang – Jeonbuk Motors prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Daegu vs Anyang — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · K-League 1

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Daegu to win

Wrong
Our model 39%Bookmakers 50%

Our track record

In 2,098 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 43.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.0%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Wrong
Our model 51%Bookmakers 54%

Our track record

In 6,458 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.2% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 2.5 goals

Correct

The bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Over 2.5 goals.

Our model 57%Bookmakers 50%

Our track record

In 801 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 46.4% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.4% than to our 55–60%.

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 78%Bookmakers 72%

Our track record

In 3,649 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 76.0% of the time (bookmakers said 76.2%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Wrong
Our model 48%Bookmakers 43%

Our track record

In 4,234 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 48.0% of the time (bookmakers said 47.2%).

Daegu Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Daegu 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 65%Bookmakers 52%

Our track record

In 2,671 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.9% of the time (bookmakers said 67.6%).

Anyang Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Anyang 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 71%Bookmakers 72%

Our track record

In 3,353 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.7% of the time (bookmakers said 72.0%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Daegu vs Anyang 0-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Daegu vs Anyang. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
K-League 1 - South Korea
DaeguDaegu0
AnyangAnyang1

Winner

12 71%

BTTS*

Yes 51%

Correct Score

1-1 14%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

under 57%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 68%

Full Time

139%
X29%
232%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT31%69%57%43%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT68%32%89%11%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Daegu30%70%65%35%
Anyang35%65%71%29%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Daegu87%13%96%4%
Anyang90%10%97%3%

1st Half

127%
X48%
225%

1st Score

149%
X10%
241%

Half Time/Full Time

X-X

21%

1-1

20%

2-2

17%

X-1

15%

X-2

11%

2-X

6%

1-X

5%

1-2

2%

2-1

2%

Correct Score

1-1

13.6%

1-0

11.4%

0-1

10.0%

0-0

9.8%

2-1

8.7%

1-2

7.2%

2-0

7.0%

0-2

5.5%

2-2

4.6%

3-1

3.5%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Anyang – Jeonbuk Motors prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores