1. Anyang vs Jeju United

Anyang vs Jeju United 2-1 Score & Prediction Review

K-League 1 - Season 2026 (Round 2)

Fair result
AnyangAnyang

2–1

Jeju UnitedJeju United
1.9Chances (xG)1.1

On these chances Anyang would usually take 1.9 points and Jeju United 0.9; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Anyang.

Anyang +1.2 pts vs chancesJeju United −0.9 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Anyang vs Jeju United stats: how the match was played

K-League 1

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Anyang had more than twice the shots on target

Anyang

Jeju United

6

Shots on target

2

1

Big chances

1

5

Corners

4

4

Yellow cards

1

49%

Possession

51%

The match between Anyang and Jeju United ended 2-1. Our AI model correctly predicted a Anyang win with 46% confidence before kick-off. Overall a solid read on this match, with 3 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Full-Time Result, Both Teams To Score & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Incheon United – Jeju United prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Anyang vs Jeju United — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · K-League 1

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Anyang to win

Correct
Our model 46%Bookmakers 42%

Our track record

In 3,477 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 49.6% of the time (bookmakers said 50.6%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Correct
Our model 51%Bookmakers 54%

Our track record

In 6,458 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.2% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 52%Bookmakers 53%

Our track record

In 5,151 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 57.1% of the time (bookmakers said 56.4%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 74%Bookmakers 75%

Our track record

In 4,551 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 72.2% of the time (bookmakers said 71.5%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Correct
Our model 45%Bookmakers 43%

Our track record

In 6,649 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.2%).

Anyang Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Anyang 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 57%Bookmakers 58%

Our track record

In 3,463 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.7% of the time (bookmakers said 61.1%).

Jeju United Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Jeju United 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 72%Bookmakers 66%

Our track record

In 3,353 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.7% of the time (bookmakers said 72.0%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Anyang vs Jeju United 2-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Anyang vs Jeju United. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
AnyangAnyang2
Jeju UnitedJeju United1

Winner

1X 73%

BTTS*

Yes 51%

Correct Score

1-1 12%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

under 52%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 64%

Full Time

146%
X27%
227%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT28%72%52%48%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT64%36%86%14%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Anyang24%76%57%43%
Jeju United38%63%72%28%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Anyang82%18%94%6%
Jeju United91%9%98%2%

1st Half

133%
X45%
222%

1st Score

153%
X8%
239%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

27%

X-X

17%

X-1

16%

2-2

13%

X-2

10%

1-X

5%

2-X

5%

2-1

3%

1-2

2%

Correct Score

1-1

12.4%

1-0

11.5%

2-1

9.8%

0-1

8.2%

2-0

8.1%

0-0

8.0%

1-2

6.7%

2-2

5.2%

3-1

4.5%

0-2

4.1%

3-0

3.9%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Incheon United – Jeju United prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores