- Home
- Al Hilal vs Al Hazm
Al Hilal vs Al Hazm 3-0 Score & Prediction Review
Pro League - Season 2025/2026 (Round 14)
3–0
On these chances Al Hilal would usually take 2.3 points and Al Hazm 0.5; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Al Hilal.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Al Hilal vs Al Hazm stats: how the match was played
Pro League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Al Hilal had more than twice the shots on target
Al Hilal
Al Hazm
7
Shots on target
1
5
Big chances
0
7
Corners
2
0
Yellow cards
0
60%
Possession
40%
Al Hilal vs Al Hazm — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Pro League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Al Hilal to win
CorrectOur track record
In 146 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 84.2% of the time (bookmakers said 81.0%).
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
WrongOur track record
In 6,517 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 1,170 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.0% of the time (bookmakers said 66.8%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Over 3.5 goals.
Our track record
In 183 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 46.4% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 44.4% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Al Hilal ahead at half-time
CorrectOur track record
In 110 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 69.1% of the time (bookmakers said 63.8%).
Our model’s pick
Al Hilal 2+ goals
CorrectOur track record
In 837 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 74.0% of the time (bookmakers said 76.5%).
Our model’s pick
Al Hazm 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 599 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 85–90% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 85.3% of the time (bookmakers said 85.0%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Al Hilal vs Al Hazm 3-0 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Al Hilal vs Al Hazm. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
1 78%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
2-0 10%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 70%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
over 59%
Winner
1 78%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
2-0 10%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 70%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
over 59%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 13% | 87% | 30% | 70% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 41% | 59% | 64% | 36% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7% | 93% | 24% | 76% | |
| 59% | 41% | 85% | 15% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48% | 52% | 71% | 29% | |
| 96% | 4% | 99% | 1% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
60%
X-1
16%
X-X
7%
2-2
4%
1-X
3%
2-1
3%
2-X
3%
X-2
2%
1-2
1%
Correct Score
2-0
10.5%
3-0
9.5%
2-1
9.0%
3-1
8.7%
1-0
7.9%
1-1
6.2%
3-2
4.3%
2-2
3.9%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score