- Home
- Al Najma vs Al Ettifaq
Al Najma vs Al Ettifaq 3-4 Score & Prediction Review
Pro League - Season 2025/2026 (Round 14)
3–4
On these chances Al Najma would usually take 1.6 points and Al Ettifaq 1.2; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Al Ettifaq.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Al Najma vs Al Ettifaq stats: how the match was played
Pro League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Al Ettifaq had clearly more shots on target
Al Najma
Al Ettifaq
5
Shots on target
8
2
Big chances
4
2
Corners
4
0
Yellow cards
2
52%
Possession
48%
Al Najma vs Al Ettifaq — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Pro League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Al Ettifaq to win
CorrectOur track record
In 1,798 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.2% of the time (bookmakers said 61.3%).
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: No, not both.
Our track record
In 544 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 44.7% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.7% than to our 55–60%.
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Under 2.5 goals.
Our track record
In 801 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 46.4% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.4% than to our 55–60%.
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
WrongOur track record
In 3,958 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.4% of the time (bookmakers said 66.8%).
Our model’s pick
Al Ettifaq ahead at half-time
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Draw at half-time.
Our track record
In 2,229 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 37.0% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 37.3% than to our 40–45%.
Our model’s pick
Al Najma 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 834 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 73.9% of the time (bookmakers said 76.5%).
Our model’s pick
Al Ettifaq 2+ goals
CorrectOur track record
In 1,589 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.8% of the time (bookmakers said 60.9%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Al Najma vs Al Ettifaq 3-4 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Al Najma vs Al Ettifaq. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
2 57%
BTTS*
Yes 56%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 56%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Winner
2 57%
BTTS*
Yes 56%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 56%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 21% | 79% | 44% | 56% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 56% | 44% | 79% | 21% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 42% | 58% | 75% | 25% | |
| 17% | 83% | 45% | 55% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 93% | 7% | 98% | 2% | |
| 71% | 29% | 88% | 12% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
2-2
34%
X-2
19%
X-X
13%
1-1
12%
X-1
7%
1-X
5%
2-X
5%
1-2
4%
2-1
2%
Correct Score
1-1
10.7%
1-2
10.6%
0-1
9.8%
0-2
9.1%
1-3
6.6%
1-0
5.6%
0-0
5.5%
0-3
5.3%
2-1
5.3%
2-2
5.2%
2-3
3.9%
2-0
3.0%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score