2. Leagues
  3. Pro League
  4. Al Hazm vs Al Kholood

Al Hazm vs Al Kholood 2-1 Score & Prediction Review

Pro League - Season 2025/2026 (Round 26)

Fair result
Al HazmAl Hazm

2–1

Al KholoodAl Kholood
1.1Chances (xG)0.9

On these chances Al Hazm would usually take 1.5 points and Al Kholood 1.2; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Al Kholood.

Al Hazm +1.5 pts vs chancesAl Kholood −1.2 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Al Hazm vs Al Kholood stats: how the match was played

Pro League

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Level on shots on target

Al Hazm

Al Kholood

3

Shots on target

4

2

Big chances

2

6

Corners

5

3

Yellow cards

1

45%

Possession

55%

The match between Al Hazm and Al Kholood ended 2-1. Our AI model predicted an Al Kholood win at 40% confidence — the final result went a different way, but individual market predictions still offer useful insight. Overall a solid read on this match, with 3 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Both Teams To Score, Over/Under 2.5 Goals & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Al Kholood – Al Ettifaq prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Al Hazm vs Al Kholood — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Pro League

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Kholood to win

Wrong
Our model 40%Bookmakers 41%

Our track record

In 2,098 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 43.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.0%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Correct
Our model 61%Bookmakers 56%

Our track record

In 2,450 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 62.5% of the time (bookmakers said 61.6%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Correct
Our model 59%Bookmakers 53%

Our track record

In 5,303 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 58.3% of the time (bookmakers said 59.1%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 64%Bookmakers 70%

Our track record

In 2,379 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.7% of the time (bookmakers said 62.8%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Correct
Our model 40%Bookmakers 41%

Our track record

In 6,652 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.2%).

Al Hazm Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Hazm 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 60%Bookmakers 63%

Our track record

In 3,465 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.6% of the time (bookmakers said 61.1%).

Al Kholood Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Al Kholood 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 55%Bookmakers 56%

Our track record

In 1,587 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.9% of the time (bookmakers said 60.9%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Al Hazm vs Al Kholood 2-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Al Hazm vs Al Kholood. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
Pro League - Saudi Arabia
Al HazmAl Hazm2
Al KholoodAl Kholood1

Winner

X2 65%

BTTS*

Yes 61%

Correct Score

1-1 11%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 59%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 54%

Full Time

135%
X25%
240%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT19%81%41%59%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT54%46%79%21%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Al Hazm28%72%60%40%
Al Kholood25%75%55%45%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Al Hazm83%17%94%6%
Al Kholood80%20%93%7%

1st Half

130%
X40%
230%

1st Score

145%
X5%
250%

Half Time/Full Time

2-2

24%

1-1

19%

X-X

15%

X-2

14%

X-1

12%

1-X

6%

2-X

6%

1-2

3%

2-1

3%

Correct Score

1-1

11.3%

1-2

9.2%

2-1

8.1%

0-1

7.2%

1-0

6.9%

2-2

6.8%

0-2

5.6%

0-0

5.0%

2-0

4.9%

1-3

4.4%

3-1

3.9%

2-3

3.5%

0-3

3.1%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Al Kholood – Al Ettifaq prediction & betting tips (Oct 24, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores