1. Odense BK vs Sønderjyske Fodbold

OB vs SønderjyskE 1-0 Score & Prediction Review

Superliga - Season 2026/2027 (Round 2)

Fair result
OBOB

1–0

SønderjyskESønderjyskE
1.7Chances (xG)0.9

On these chances OB would usually take 1.9 points and SønderjyskE 0.8; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: OB.

OB +1.1 pts vs chancesSønderjyskE −0.8 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

OB vs SønderjyskE stats: how the match was played

Superliga

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Level on shots on target

OB

SønderjyskE

4

Shots on target

3

2

Big chances

2

7

Corners

9

1

Yellow cards

1

56%

Possession

44%

The match between OB and SønderjyskE ended 1-0. Our AI model correctly predicted a OB win with 50% confidence before kick-off. Overall a solid read on this match, with 2 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Full-Time Result & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: SønderjyskE – Silkeborg prediction & betting tips (Oct 18, 2026).

OB vs SønderjyskE — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Superliga

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

OB to win

Correct
Our model 50%Bookmakers 42%

Our track record

In 2,492 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 54.6% of the time (bookmakers said 55.1%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Wrong
Our model 59%Bookmakers 63%

Our track record

In 5,719 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 56.8% of the time (bookmakers said 57.7%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 59%Bookmakers 61%

Our track record

In 5,328 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 58.4% of the time (bookmakers said 59.1%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 64%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 2,399 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.6% of the time (bookmakers said 62.9%).

First Half Result →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

OB ahead at half-time

Wrong

The bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Draw at half-time.

Our model 43%Bookmakers 35%

Our track record

In 2,232 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 36.9% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 37.3% than to our 40–45%.

OB Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

OB 2+ goals

Wrong
Our model 52%Bookmakers 52%

Our track record

In 2,822 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.4% of the time (bookmakers said 58.6%).

SønderjyskE Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

SønderjyskE 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 68%Bookmakers 60%

Our track record

In 3,276 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.3% of the time (bookmakers said 67.7%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

OB vs SønderjyskE 1-0 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for OB vs SønderjyskE. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
OBOB1
SønderjyskESønderjyskE0

Winner

1 50%

BTTS*

Yes 59%

Correct Score

1-1 10%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 59%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 54%

Full Time

150%
X23%
227%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT19%81%41%59%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT54%46%78%22%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
OB20%80%48%52%
SønderjyskE37%63%68%32%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
OB74%26%89%11%
SønderjyskE88%12%96%4%

1st Half

143%
X36%
221%

1st Score

163%
X5%
232%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

35%

X-1

17%

X-X

13%

2-2

13%

X-2

7%

1-X

5%

2-X

5%

2-1

4%

1-2

2%

Correct Score

1-1

10.4%

2-1

9.6%

1-0

8.4%

2-0

7.5%

1-2

6.7%

2-2

6.0%

0-1

5.9%

3-1

5.4%

0-0

5.1%

3-0

4.6%

0-2

3.7%

3-2

3.4%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: SønderjyskE – Silkeborg prediction & betting tips (Oct 18, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores