1. Randers FC vs AGF

Randers vs AGF 2-1 Score & Prediction Review

Superliga - Season 2026/2027 (Round 6)

Fair result
RandersRanders

2–1

AGFAGF
1.1Chances (xG)1.5

On these chances Randers would usually take 1.1 points and AGF 1.7; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: AGF.

Randers +1.9 pts vs chancesAGF −1.7 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Randers vs AGF stats: how the match was played

Superliga

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Level on shots on target

Randers

AGF

5

Shots on target

6

3

Big chances

1

1

Corners

5

3

Yellow cards

2

1

Red cards

0

41%

Possession

59%

The match between Randers and AGF ended 2-1. Our AI model correctly predicted a Randers win with 41% confidence before kick-off. A strong performance overall — our model hit all 4 key markets for this fixture, correctly calling Full-Time Result, Both Teams To Score, Over/Under 2.5 Goals & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: AGF – Lyngby prediction & betting tips (Nov 20, 2026).

Randers vs AGF — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · Superliga

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Randers to win

Correct

The bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: AGF to win.

Our model 41%Bookmakers 31%

Our track record

In 1,071 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 29.5% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 30.2% than to our 40–45%.

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Yes, both score

Correct
Our model 58%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 5,740 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 56.7% of the time (bookmakers said 57.9%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Over 2.5 goals

Correct
Our model 54%Bookmakers 57%

Our track record

In 5,121 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 57.2% of the time (bookmakers said 56.5%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 68%Bookmakers 66%

Our track record

In 3,993 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.2% of the time (bookmakers said 66.6%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Wrong
Our model 40%Bookmakers 41%

Our track record

In 1,937 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 40.9% of the time (bookmakers said 41.2%).

Randers Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Randers 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 58%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 3,485 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 62.2% of the time (bookmakers said 61.3%).

AGF Goals →Disagrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

AGF 0–1 goals

Correct

The bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: AGF 2+ goals.

Our model 63%Bookmakers 50%

Our track record

In 388 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 42.8% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.7% than to our 60–65%.

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Randers vs AGF 2-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Randers vs AGF. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
RandersRanders2
AGFAGF1

Winner

1X 67%

BTTS*

Yes 58%

Correct Score

1-1 12%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

over 54%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 58%

Full Time

141%
X26%
233%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT23%77%46%54%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT58%42%82%18%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Randers26%74%58%42%
AGF31%69%63%37%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Randers82%18%94%6%
AGF86%14%95%5%

1st Half

132%
X40%
228%

1st Score

150%
X6%
243%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

24%

2-2

18%

X-1

15%

X-X

15%

X-2

11%

2-X

6%

1-X

5%

1-2

3%

2-1

3%

Correct Score

1-1

11.8%

1-0

9.0%

2-1

8.8%

1-2

8.0%

0-1

7.6%

0-0

6.4%

2-2

6.4%

2-0

6.3%

0-2

5.1%

3-1

4.4%

1-3

3.4%

3-0

3.1%

3-2

3.0%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: AGF – Lyngby prediction & betting tips (Nov 20, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores