- Home
- Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers
Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers 0-0 Score & Prediction Review
Championship - Season 2026/2027 (Round 6)
0–0
On these chances Charlton Athletic would usually take 0.9 points and Queens Park Rangers 1.8; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: Queens Park Rangers.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers stats: how the match was played
Championship
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Queens Park Rangers had more than twice the shots on target
Charlton Athletic
Queens Park Rangers
0
Shots on target
2
1
Big chances
1
5
Corners
12
0
Yellow cards
2
28%
Possession
72%
Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Championship
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Queens Park Rangers to win
WrongOur track record
In 3,592 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 47.2% of the time (bookmakers said 47.0%).
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
WrongOur track record
In 5,690 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 56.8% of the time (bookmakers said 57.8%).
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Under 2.5 goals.
Our track record
In 801 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 46.4% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 46.4% than to our 55–60%.
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,952 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.5% of the time (bookmakers said 66.8%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
CorrectOur track record
In 6,652 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.2%).
Our model’s pick
Charlton Athletic 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,454 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.9% of the time (bookmakers said 63.9%).
Our model’s pick
Queens Park Rangers 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 1,589 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.8% of the time (bookmakers said 60.9%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers 0-0 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Charlton Athletic vs Queens Park Rangers. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
X2 67%
BTTS*
Yes 57%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 55%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Winner
X2 67%
BTTS*
Yes 57%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 55%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 23% | 77% | 45% | 55% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 56% | 44% | 80% | 20% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31% | 69% | 63% | 37% | |
| 26% | 74% | 57% | 43% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84% | 16% | 94% | 6% | |
| 81% | 19% | 93% | 7% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
2-2
25%
X-X
17%
1-1
16%
X-2
15%
X-1
10%
2-X
6%
1-X
5%
1-2
3%
2-1
2%
Correct Score
1-1
11.4%
0-1
8.9%
1-2
8.6%
2-1
7.4%
1-0
7.3%
0-0
6.3%
2-2
6.2%
0-2
6.1%
2-0
4.6%
1-3
4.4%
3-1
3.3%
0-3
3.1%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score