AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs Morecambe 2-1 Score & Prediction Review
FA Cup - Season 2026/2027 4th Round Qualifying (Qualifying)
AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs Morecambe stats: how the match was played
FA Cup
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Level on shots on target
AFC Rushden & Diamonds
Morecambe
8
Shots on target
10
4
Corners
5
0
Yellow cards
0
AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs Morecambe — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · FA Cup
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Morecambe to win
WrongOur track record
In 3,511 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 49.2% of the time (bookmakers said 50.5%).
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
CorrectOur track record
In 5,722 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 56.8% of the time (bookmakers said 57.7%).
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,118 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.5% of the time (bookmakers said 62.6%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 2,400 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.6% of the time (bookmakers said 62.9%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Morecambe ahead at half-time.
Our track record
In 1,230 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 36.0% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 35.1% than to our 35–40%.
Our model’s pick
AFC Rushden & Diamonds 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 3,467 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.8% of the time (bookmakers said 63.9%).
Our model’s pick
Morecambe 2+ goals
WrongOur track record
In 1,011 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 59.5% of the time (bookmakers said 59.2%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs Morecambe 2-1 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs Morecambe. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
X2 69%
BTTS*
Yes 59%
Correct Score
1-1 09%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 62%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 51%
Winner
X2 69%
BTTS*
Yes 59%
Correct Score
1-1 09%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 62%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 51%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 17% | 83% | 38% | 62% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 51% | 49% | 75% | 25% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35% | 65% | 64% | 36% | |
| 22% | 78% | 50% | 50% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84% | 16% | 94% | 6% | |
| 74% | 26% | 88% | 12% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
2-2
27%
1-1
20%
X-2
15%
X-X
12%
X-1
11%
2-X
5%
1-X
4%
1-2
3%
2-1
3%
Correct Score
1-1
9.4%
1-2
8.8%
0-1
7.4%
2-1
7.1%
0-2
7.1%
2-2
5.7%
1-0
5.6%
1-3
5.1%
0-0
4.5%
0-3
4.3%
2-0
4.1%
2-3
3.5%
3-1
3.2%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score
AFC Rushden & Diamonds vs Morecambe — Recent Form
Our prediction record
Our last 5 predictions in each team’s matches, by market.
Full-Time Result
Both Teams to Score
Over/Under 2.5 Goals
Over/Under 3.5 Goals
First Half Result
Correct Score