2. Leagues
  3. J-League
  4. Gamba Osaka vs Avispa Fukuoka

Gamba Osaka vs Avispa Fukuoka 2-1 Score & Prediction Review

J-League - Season 2025 (Round 2)

Fair result
Gamba OsakaGamba Osaka

2–1

Avispa FukuokaAvispa Fukuoka
0.9Chances (xG)1.5

On these chances Gamba Osaka would usually take 1.0 points and Avispa Fukuoka 1.8; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Gamba Osaka.

Gamba Osaka +2.0 pts vs chancesAvispa Fukuoka −1.8 pts vs chances

Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model

How it works

Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.

Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.

Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.

How we measure →

Gamba Osaka vs Avispa Fukuoka stats: how the match was played

J-League

Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.

Avispa Fukuoka had more than twice the shots on target

Gamba Osaka

Avispa Fukuoka

2

Shots on target

5

3

Big chances

0

3

Corners

8

0

Yellow cards

2

46%

Possession

54%

The match between Gamba Osaka and Avispa Fukuoka ended 2-1. Our AI model correctly predicted a Gamba Osaka win with 46% confidence before kick-off. Overall a solid read on this match, with 2 out of 4 key markets predicted correctly, including Full-Time Result & Over/Under 3.5 Goals.
This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Machida Zelvia – Avispa Fukuoka prediction & betting tips (Oct 18, 2026).

Gamba Osaka vs Avispa Fukuoka — Our Model vs the Bookmakers

Market check · J-League

How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.

How to read it

our model’s probabilitybookmakers’ probabilityAgreesDisagreesour model’s pick is / is not the bookmakers’ favouriteTrack record: finished matches from the last 12 months
Full-Time Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Gamba Osaka to win

Correct
Our model 46%Bookmakers 49%

Our track record

In 3,475 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 49.3% of the time (bookmakers said 50.4%).

Both Teams to Score →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

No, not both

Wrong
Our model 52%Bookmakers 58%

Our track record

In 6,435 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.4% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).

Over/Under 2.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 2.5 goals

Wrong
Our model 56%Bookmakers 63%

Our track record

In 5,281 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 58.6% of the time (bookmakers said 59.1%).

Over/Under 3.5 Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Under 3.5 goals

Correct
Our model 78%Bookmakers 83%

Our track record

In 3,654 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 75–80% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 75.9% of the time (bookmakers said 76.3%).

First Half Result →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Draw at half-time

Wrong
Our model 46%Bookmakers 48%

Our track record

In 4,218 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 47.7% of the time (bookmakers said 47.3%).

Gamba Osaka Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Gamba Osaka 0–1 goals

Wrong
Our model 60%Bookmakers 62%

Our track record

In 3,452 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.8% of the time (bookmakers said 61.1%).

Avispa Fukuoka Goals →Agrees with bookmakers

Our model’s pick

Avispa Fukuoka 0–1 goals

Correct
Our model 75%Bookmakers 80%

Our track record

In 3,345 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.5% of the time (bookmakers said 72.1%).

Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.

Gamba Osaka vs Avispa Fukuoka 2-1 — How Our Predictions Performed

The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Gamba Osaka vs Avispa Fukuoka. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.

· FT
J-League - Japan
Gamba OsakaGamba Osaka2
Avispa FukuokaAvispa Fukuoka1

Winner

1X 74%

BTTS*

No 52%

Correct Score

1-0 13%

Over/Under 2.5 goals

under 56%

Over/Under 3.5 goals

under 68%

Full Time

146%
X27%
226%

Goals Over/Under

<1.5>1.5<2.5>2.5
FT31%69%56%44%
<3.5>3.5<4.5>4.5
FT68%32%89%11%

Team Goals Over/Under

<0.5>0.5<1.5>1.5
Gamba Osaka26%74%60%40%
Avispa Fukuoka40%60%75%25%
<2.5>2.5<3.5>3.5
Gamba Osaka84%16%95%5%
Avispa Fukuoka92%8%98%2%

1st Half

132%
X46%
222%

1st Score

152%
X9%
239%

Half Time/Full Time

1-1

25%

X-X

18%

X-1

17%

2-2

15%

X-2

12%

1-X

5%

2-X

5%

1-2

2%

2-1

2%

Correct Score

1-0

12.6%

1-1

12.5%

2-1

9.7%

0-0

9.4%

0-1

8.8%

2-0

8.7%

1-2

6.6%

2-2

4.6%

3-0

4.2%

0-2

4.2%

3-1

3.7%

*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)

*BTTS - Both teams to score

This match is finished — the model has already priced the next one: Machida Zelvia – Avispa Fukuoka prediction & betting tips (Oct 18, 2026).

Recommended Partners

Live Football Scores