- Home
- Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town
Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town 1-2 Score & Prediction Review
League One - Season 2026/2027 (Round 3)
1–2
On these chances Cambridge United would usually take 1.1 points and Huddersfield Town 1.7; they took 0 and 3. Bookmakers' favourite: Huddersfield Town.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town stats: how the match was played
League One
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Level on shots on target
Cambridge United
Huddersfield Town
4
Shots on target
4
1
Big chances
1
4
Corners
3
1
Yellow cards
1
50%
Possession
50%
Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · League One
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Cambridge United to win
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Huddersfield Town to win.
Our track record
In 1,080 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 30.1% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 30.2% than to our 40–45%.
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
CorrectOur track record
In 6,494 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.4% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).
Our model’s pick
Under 2.5 goals
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was correct: Over 2.5 goals.
Our track record
In 2,875 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 44.2% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.2% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 4,585 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 72.2% of the time (bookmakers said 71.4%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
CorrectOur track record
In 4,301 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 48.1% of the time (bookmakers said 47.2%).
Our model’s pick
Cambridge United 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,506 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 62.0% of the time (bookmakers said 61.2%).
Our model’s pick
Huddersfield Town 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 3,386 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 71.6% of the time (bookmakers said 71.9%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town 1-2 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Cambridge United vs Huddersfield Town. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
1X 70%
BTTS*
Yes 51%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 53%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 65%
Winner
1X 70%
BTTS*
Yes 51%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 53%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 65%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 28% | 72% | 53% | 47% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 65% | 35% | 86% | 14% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26% | 74% | 60% | 40% | |
| 36% | 64% | 70% | 30% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 83% | 17% | 94% | 6% | |
| 89% | 11% | 97% | 3% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
23%
X-X
18%
2-2
17%
X-1
15%
X-2
12%
2-X
6%
1-X
5%
1-2
2%
2-1
2%
Correct Score
1-1
12.3%
1-0
11.1%
2-1
8.8%
0-1
8.8%
0-0
7.9%
2-0
7.8%
1-2
7.2%
2-2
5.0%
0-2
4.8%
3-1
4.0%
3-0
3.8%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score