- Home
- Tianjin Jinmen Tiger vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 0-0 Score & Prediction Review
Super League - Season 2026 (Round 1)
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger0–0
Chongqing Tonglianglong FCOn these chances Tianjin Jinmen Tiger would usually take 1.6 points and Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 1.0; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: Tianjin Jinmen Tiger.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Tianjin Jinmen Tiger vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC stats: how the match was played
Super League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger had more than twice the shots on target
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
2
Shots on target
1
1
Big chances
0
2
Corners
4
2
Yellow cards
3
50%
Possession
50%
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Super League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC to win
WrongThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Tianjin Jinmen Tiger to win.
Our track record
In 1,532 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 28.7% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 29.5% than to our 35–40%.
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
WrongOur track record
In 6,503 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).
Our model’s pick
Under 2.5 goals
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Over 2.5 goals.
Our track record
In 2,861 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 44.0% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.2% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 4,585 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 72.1% of the time (bookmakers said 71.5%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Tianjin Jinmen Tiger ahead at half-time.
Our track record
In 2,233 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 36.7% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 37.3% than to our 40–45%.
Our model’s pick
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 0–1 goals
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Tianjin Jinmen Tiger 2+ goals.
Our track record
In 388 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 43.3% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.9% than to our 60–65%.
Our model’s pick
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 2,676 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.5% of the time (bookmakers said 63.8%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 0-0 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Tianjin Jinmen Tiger vs Chongqing Tonglianglong FC. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger0
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC0Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger0Chongqing Tonglianglong FC0Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 26% | 74% | 51% | 49% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 62% | 38% | 85% | 15% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31% | 69% | 64% | 36% |
| 30% | 70% | 63% | 37% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86% | 14% | 95% | 5% |
| 85% | 15% | 95% | 5% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
2-2
27%
1-1
16%
X-2
16%
X-X
15%
X-1
11%
1-X
5%
2-X
5%
1-2
3%
2-1
2%
Correct Score
1-1
12.1%
0-1
9.4%
1-0
9.3%
1-2
8.2%
2-1
7.8%
0-0
7.3%
0-2
6.2%
2-0
6.2%
2-2
5.2%
1-3
3.7%
3-1
3.5%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score