Sport Welcome Bonus 100% UP TO €300
Super League China Pr Predictions and Betting Tips
The Chinese Super League is the top professional football league in China. It consists of 16 teams and operates on a system of promotion and relegation. The Chinese Super League is known for its high-profile signings and ambitious clubs. Guangzhou Evergrande Taobao FC is the most successful club in Chinese Super League history.
China PR
In the Super League China PR 2024 season, the winner [1,X,2] prediction accuracy stands at 54%, calculated based on the model's performance over the last 100 matches of the league. Both Teams To Score (BTTS) accuracy is at 61%. Correct Score prediction accuracy is 25%. Over/Under 2.5 goals prediction accuracy is 63%, while Over/Under 3.5 goals prediction accuracy is 58%.
These figures represent the hit ratio: the number of times the model predicts the right outcome over the last 100 matches of the league. The closer to 100%, the better the model's performance. Leveraging advanced machine-learning techniques and historical data, our model accurately predicts the outcomes of future football matches, considering various factors such as team form, player injuries, head-to-head records, and more.
Betting Tips for Super League
1 | 33% | |
X | 26% | |
2 | 41% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Meizhou Hakka | 32% | 68% | 65% | 35% |
Beijing Guoan | 26% | 74% | 59% | 41% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 48% | 52% | 70% | 30% |
1-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.9% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 8.2% | 7.7% | 6.8% | 6.5% |
1 | 33% | |
X | 26% | |
2 | 41% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
32% | 68% | 65% | 35% | |
26% | 74% | 59% | 41% | |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 48% | 52% | 70% | 30% |
1-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.9% | 9.3% | 8.7% | 8.2% | 7.7% | 6.8% | 6.5% |
1 | 20% | |
X | 20% | |
2 | 60% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Changchun Yatai | 44% | 56% | 74% | 26% |
Shanghai Port | 14% | 86% | 39% | 61% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 37% | 63% | 60% | 40% |
1-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.4% | 9.2% | 8.8% | 8.6% | 6.6% | 6.0% |
1 | 20% | |
X | 20% | |
2 | 60% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
44% | 56% | 74% | 26% | |
14% | 86% | 39% | 61% | |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 37% | 63% | 60% | 40% |
1-2 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 0-1 | 1-3 | 0-3 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.4% | 9.2% | 8.8% | 8.6% | 6.6% | 6.0% |
1 | 45% | |
X | 24% | |
2 | 31% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shandong Taishan | 22% | 78% | 52% | 48% |
Wuhan Three Towns | 32% | 68% | 63% | 37% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 40% | 60% | 63% | 37% |
1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 2-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.8% | 9.0% | 7.8% | 7.6% | 6.5% | 6.4% | 6.3% |
1 | 45% | |
X | 24% | |
2 | 31% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
22% | 78% | 52% | 48% | |
32% | 68% | 63% | 37% | |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 40% | 60% | 63% | 37% |
1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 2-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.8% | 9.0% | 7.8% | 7.6% | 6.5% | 6.4% | 6.3% |
1 | 28% | |
X | 22% | |
2 | 50% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Henan Songshan Longmen | 37% | 63% | 68% | 32% |
Chengdu Rongcheng | 21% | 79% | 49% | 51% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 41% | 59% | 64% | 36% |
1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 2-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
10.2% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 7.9% | 6.4% |
1 | 28% | |
X | 22% | |
2 | 50% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
37% | 63% | 68% | 32% | |
21% | 79% | 49% | 51% | |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 41% | 59% | 64% | 36% |
1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 2-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
10.2% | 9.7% | 9.2% | 7.9% | 6.4% |
1 | 69% | |
X | 18% | |
2 | 13% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shanghai Shenhua | 11% | 89% | 32% | 68% |
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 52% | 48% | 81% | 20% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 35% | 65% | 57% | 43% |
2-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 3-0 | 1-1 | 3-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.8% | 9.8% | 8.5% | 7.9% | 7.7% | 7.1% |
1 | 69% | |
X | 18% | |
2 | 13% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
11% | 89% | 32% | 68% | |
52% | 48% | 81% | 20% | |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 35% | 65% | 57% | 43% |
2-1 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 3-0 | 1-1 | 3-1 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.8% | 9.8% | 8.5% | 7.9% | 7.7% | 7.1% |
1 | 38% | |
X | 26% | |
2 | 35% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Qingdao Youth Island | 30% | 70% | 63% | 37% |
Sichuan | 33% | 67% | 64% | 36% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 50% | 50% | 72% | 28% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 2-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.4% | 10.5% | 8.7% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 7.7% | 6.6% |
1 | 38% | |
X | 26% | |
2 | 35% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
30% | 70% | 63% | 37% | |
33% | 67% | 64% | 36% | |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 50% | 50% | 72% | 28% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 2-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.4% | 10.5% | 8.7% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 7.7% | 6.6% |
1 | 49% | |
X | 24% | |
2 | 27% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nantong Zhiyun | 21% | 79% | 52% | 48% |
Qingdao Hainiu | 38% | 62% | 70% | 30% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 46% | 54% | 69% | 31% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.0% | 10.5% | 9.6% | 7.9% | 7.0% | 6.9% |
1 | 49% | |
X | 24% | |
2 | 27% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
21% | 79% | 52% | 48% | |
38% | 62% | 70% | 30% | |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 46% | 54% | 69% | 31% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.0% | 10.5% | 9.6% | 7.9% | 7.0% | 6.9% |
1 | 63% | |
X | 17% | |
2 | 19% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hangzhou | 13% | 87% | 33% | 67% |
Cangzhou | 46% | 54% | 72% | 28% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 28% | 72% | 50% | 50% |
2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 1-0 | 3-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.2% | 7.0% | 6.7% | 6.6% | 6.1% | 6.1% |
1 | 63% | |
X | 17% | |
2 | 19% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
13% | 87% | 33% | 67% | |
46% | 54% | 72% | 28% | |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 28% | 72% | 50% | 50% |
2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 1-0 | 3-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
9.2% | 7.0% | 6.7% | 6.6% | 6.1% | 6.1% |
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in %
*BTTS - Both teams to score