Super League China Pr Predictions and Betting Tips
The Chinese Super League is the top professional football league in China. It consists of 16 teams and operates on a system of promotion and relegation. The Chinese Super League is known for its high-profile signings and ambitious clubs. Guangzhou Evergrande Taobao FC is the most successful club in Chinese Super League history.
China PR
![Super League](/_next/image/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fres.cloudinary.com%2Fmybetodds%2Fimage%2Fupload%2Fv1714182779%2Fmygameodds%2Fleagues%2Fgyvluapjnkorzkas3lpx.png&w=128&q=75)
In the Super League China PR 2024 season, the winner [1,X,2] prediction accuracy stands at 54%, calculated based on the model's performance over the last 100 matches of the league. Both Teams To Score (BTTS) accuracy is at 61%. Correct Score prediction accuracy is 25%. Over/Under 2.5 goals prediction accuracy is 63%, while Over/Under 3.5 goals prediction accuracy is 58%.
These figures represent the hit ratio: the number of times the model predicts the right outcome over the last 100 matches of the league. The closer to 100%, the better the model's performance. Leveraging advanced machine-learning techniques and historical data, our model accurately predicts the outcomes of future football matches, considering various factors such as team form, player injuries, head-to-head records, and more.
Betting Tips for Super League
1 | 61% | |
X | 21% | |
2 | 18% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Changchun Yatai | 16% | 84% | 44% | 56% |
Cangzhou | 49% | 51% | 80% | 20% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 46% | 54% | 67% | 33% |
1-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 3-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|
11.6% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 9.4% | 6.4% |
1 | 61% | |
X | 21% | |
2 | 18% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 16% | 84% | 44% | 56% |
![]() | 49% | 51% | 80% | 20% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 46% | 54% | 67% | 33% |
1-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 3-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|
11.6% | 10.2% | 10.1% | 9.4% | 6.4% |
1 | 49% | |
X | 27% | |
2 | 24% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 23% | 77% | 55% | 45% |
Qingdao Youth Island | 41% | 59% | 74% | 26% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 52% | 48% | 73% | 27% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.2% | 12.0% | 8.9% | 8.3% | 8.2% | 7.5% | 6.2% |
1 | 49% | |
X | 27% | |
2 | 24% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 23% | 77% | 55% | 45% |
![]() | 41% | 59% | 74% | 26% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 52% | 48% | 73% | 27% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.2% | 12.0% | 8.9% | 8.3% | 8.2% | 7.5% | 6.2% |
1 | 36% | |
X | 23% | |
2 | 41% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hangzhou | 28% | 72% | 58% | 42% |
Chengdu Rongcheng | 25% | 75% | 55% | 45% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 39% | 61% | 60% | 40% |
1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.4% | 8.4% | 7.6% | 6.9% | 6.6% | 6.5% |
1 | 36% | |
X | 23% | |
2 | 41% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 28% | 72% | 58% | 42% |
![]() | 25% | 75% | 55% | 45% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 39% | 61% | 60% | 40% |
1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.4% | 8.4% | 7.6% | 6.9% | 6.6% | 6.5% |
1 | 49% | |
X | 25% | |
2 | 27% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Qingdao Hainiu | 22% | 78% | 54% | 46% |
Meizhou Hakka | 37% | 63% | 71% | 29% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 48% | 52% | 71% | 29% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.1% | 10.6% | 9.6% | 8.2% | 7.3% | 6.9% | 6.3% |
1 | 49% | |
X | 25% | |
2 | 27% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 22% | 78% | 54% | 46% |
![]() | 37% | 63% | 71% | 29% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 48% | 52% | 71% | 29% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.1% | 10.6% | 9.6% | 8.2% | 7.3% | 6.9% | 6.3% |
1 | 33% | |
X | 26% | |
2 | 41% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Henan Songshan Longmen | 32% | 68% | 64% | 36% |
Shandong Taishan | 26% | 74% | 58% | 42% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 47% | 53% | 68% | 32% |
1-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.9% | 9.2% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 7.3% | 6.8% | 6.5% |
1 | 33% | |
X | 26% | |
2 | 41% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 32% | 68% | 64% | 36% |
![]() | 26% | 74% | 58% | 42% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 47% | 53% | 68% | 32% |
1-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-2 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.9% | 9.2% | 8.7% | 7.7% | 7.3% | 6.8% | 6.5% |
1 | 17% | |
X | 21% | |
2 | 61% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wuhan Three Towns | 48% | 52% | 80% | 20% |
Shanghai Shenhua | 17% | 83% | 46% | 54% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 48% | 52% | 71% | 29% |
0-1 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.8% | 10.8% | 10.6% | 10.1% | 6.8% | 6.8% |
1 | 17% | |
X | 21% | |
2 | 61% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 48% | 52% | 80% | 20% |
![]() | 17% | 83% | 46% | 54% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 48% | 52% | 71% | 29% |
0-1 | 0-2 | 1-2 | 1-1 | 0-3 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.8% | 10.8% | 10.6% | 10.1% | 6.8% | 6.8% |
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in %
*BTTS - Both teams to score