Wuhan Three Towns vs Dalian Zhixing 4-1 Score & Prediction Review
Super League - Season 2026 (Round 2)
Wuhan Three Towns won with fewer chances than Dalian Zhixing
4–1
On these chances Wuhan Three Towns would usually take 0.8 points and Dalian Zhixing 2.1; they took 3 and 0. Bookmakers' favourite: Dalian Zhixing.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Wuhan Three Towns vs Dalian Zhixing stats: how the match was played
Super League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Level on shots on target
Wuhan Three Towns
Dalian Zhixing
6
Shots on target
6
2
Big chances
4
4
Corners
4
5
Yellow cards
1
41%
Possession
59%
Wuhan Three Towns vs Dalian Zhixing — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Super League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Dalian Zhixing to win
WrongOur track record
In 2,082 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 43.6% of the time (bookmakers said 43.9%).
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
CorrectOur track record
In 6,410 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.4% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
CorrectThe bookmakers’ favourite was wrong: Under 2.5 goals.
Our track record
In 2,817 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance but the bookmakers favoured a different outcome, it came true 44.0% of the time: closer to the bookmakers’ 45.2% than to our 50–55%.
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
WrongOur track record
In 4,518 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 72.2% of the time (bookmakers said 71.6%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
WrongOur track record
In 2,012 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 35–40% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 40.2% of the time (bookmakers said 41.2%).
Our model’s pick
Wuhan Three Towns 0–1 goals
WrongOur track record
In 3,424 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 64.0% of the time (bookmakers said 64.0%).
Our model’s pick
Dalian Zhixing 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 2,661 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 60–65% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 63.1% of the time (bookmakers said 63.8%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Wuhan Three Towns vs Dalian Zhixing 4-1 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Wuhan Three Towns vs Dalian Zhixing. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 25% | 75% | 49% | 51% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 61% | 39% | 83% | 17% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 31% | 69% | 64% | 36% | |
| 29% | 71% | 62% | 38% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 85% | 15% | 95% | 5% | |
| 84% | 16% | 94% | 6% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
2-2
23%
1-1
22%
X-1
13%
X-X
13%
X-2
13%
1-X
5%
2-X
5%
1-2
3%
2-1
3%
Correct Score
1-1
11.8%
0-1
9.3%
1-0
9.1%
1-2
8.3%
2-1
7.9%
0-0
7.1%
0-2
5.8%
2-0
5.8%
2-2
5.4%
1-3
3.7%
3-1
3.6%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score