- Home
- Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs Zhejiang
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs Hangzhou 1-1 Score & Prediction Review
Super League - Season 2026 (Round 19)
1–1
On these chances Chongqing Tonglianglong FC would usually take 1.7 points and Hangzhou 1.0; they took 1 and 1. Bookmakers' favourite: Chongqing Tonglianglong FC.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Chances (xG): every shot gets a value for how likely it was to go in, and we add them up (our own model). Points their chances were worth: how many points teams usually get from chances like these.
Smash-and-grab: the winner created at least 0.8 xG less than the loser. Robbed: a draw where one side created at least 0.8 xG more. Anything else is a fair result. No verdict after extra time or when there's no xG.
Can you trust it? In these games, SportMonks' own xG agreed on who created more in 95% of the wins and 98% of the draws, and Flashscore agreed in 16 of the 20 games we checked by hand.
How we measure →Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs Hangzhou stats: how the match was played
Super League
Whether the result matched the chances each side created, measured with our own xG.
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC had clearly more shots on target
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC
Hangzhou
3
Shots on target
2
2
Big chances
2
4
Corners
1
0
Yellow cards
2
62%
Possession
38%
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs Hangzhou — Our Model vs the Bookmakers
Market check · Super League
How our model’s pick did in each market, next to the bookmakers’ last odds before kick-off (margin removed): what was correct, what was wrong, and how often our predictions like this one came true over the last 12 months.
How to read it
Our model’s pick
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC to win
WrongOur track record
In 3,491 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 45–50% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 49.6% of the time (bookmakers said 50.5%).
Our model’s pick
Yes, both score
CorrectOur track record
In 6,481 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 55.3% of the time (bookmakers said 55.0%).
Our model’s pick
Over 2.5 goals
WrongOur track record
In 5,162 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 50–55% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 57.1% of the time (bookmakers said 56.4%).
Our model’s pick
Under 3.5 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 4,571 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 70–75% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 72.2% of the time (bookmakers said 71.5%).
Our model’s pick
Draw at half-time
WrongOur track record
In 6,676 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 40–45% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 44.7% of the time (bookmakers said 44.2%).
Our model’s pick
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,469 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 55–60% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 61.8% of the time (bookmakers said 61.2%).
Our model’s pick
Hangzhou 0–1 goals
CorrectOur track record
In 3,277 matches over the last 12 months where our model gave the same pick a 65–70% chance and the bookmakers agreed, it came true 68.3% of the time (bookmakers said 67.8%).
Odds: the last ones before kick-off. Picks are marked on the result after 90 minutes. The track record uses closing odds.
Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs Hangzhou 1-1 — How Our Predictions Performed
The prediction cards below show the pre-match probabilities our AI model generated for Chongqing Tonglianglong FC vs Hangzhou. Correct predictions are highlighted in green, so you can quickly see where the model read this match well.
Winner
1X 72%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 52%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Winner
1X 72%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 52%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Full Time
Goals Over/Under
| <1.5 | >1.5 | <2.5 | >2.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 24% | 76% | 48% | 52% |
| <3.5 | >3.5 | <4.5 | >4.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 61% | 39% | 84% | 16% |
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23% | 77% | 55% | 45% | |
| 36% | 64% | 70% | 30% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 80% | 20% | 93% | 7% | |
| 89% | 11% | 97% | 3% |
1st Half
1st Score
Half Time/Full Time
1-1
25%
X-1
16%
X-X
16%
2-2
16%
X-2
11%
1-X
6%
2-X
6%
2-1
3%
1-2
2%
Correct Score
1-1
12.0%
1-0
10.1%
2-1
9.7%
2-0
7.7%
0-1
7.5%
1-2
7.2%
0-0
6.6%
2-2
5.5%
3-1
4.7%
3-0
4.2%
0-2
4.2%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score