Brick wall
6/10Tokyo kept 6 clean sheets in their last 10 (league 27%).
J-League Predictions & Stats
Free AI predictions for every upcoming J-League match — 1X2, Both Teams to Score, Over/Under goals and Correct Score probabilities.
Predictions updated on 10 October 2026.
J-League Predictions by Market
Season 2026/2027 · Round 9 · Regular Season
Full-Time Result
54%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
Both Teams To Score
57%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
Over/Under 2.5 Goals
56%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
Over/Under 3.5 Goals
66%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
First Half Result
46%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
Correct Score
12%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
J-League 2026/2027 prediction accuracy over the last 100 matches: 1X2 54%, BTTS 57%, Over/Under 2.5 56%, Over/Under 3.5 66%, correct score 12%.
J-League stats: goals, BTTS, corners and cards vs other leagues
How this competition ranks among the leagues and cups we cover for goals, chances (xG), corners and cards.
How to read it
last 12 months · 132 matchesrank 1 = highest of 63 competitionsHome fortress
Goals a match
2.79
24th of 63
xG a match
2.74
39th of 62
Corners a match
9.3
43rd of 62
Cards a match
2.77
63rd of 63
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
We use the league's matches from the last 12 months, without qualifying rounds, and rank it against the 63 leagues and club competitions with 50 or more matches in that time (1 = highest). A label marks a league in the top fifth on goals, home or away wins, draws, cards or corners, or in the bottom fifth on goals. xG is our estimate of each match's chances from its shots.
J-League: the stats that stand out
The J-League teams most unusual in their last 10 games.
How to read it
the teamleague averageeach team's last 10 games6/10Slow starters
1/10Gamba Osaka scored first in only 1 of 10 recent matches with goal times (league 47%).
Always chasing
8/10Shimizu S-Pulse conceded first in 8 of 10 recent matches with goal times (league 47%).
Always on the scoresheet
0/10Urawa Reds scored in all of their last 10 (league 27% fail to score).
Goals at both ends
8/10Kawasaki Frontale: both teams scored in 8 of their last 10 (league 54%).
Low-scoring
3/10Tokyo Verdy games went over 2.5 goals in only 3 of their last 10 (league 51%).
Banker as favourites
7/9Kashiwa Reysol won 7 of 9 as favourites (league 57%).
Calculated by MyGameOdds
How it works
For each stat we show the club that stands out most, one club per stat. A fact needs at least 6 games and a result far enough from the league average to be unusual (at least one standard deviation).
How we measure →Today's Betting Tips for J-League Japan
Free predictions for today's J-League matches: 1X2, both teams to score, over/under and correct score.
Cerezo Osaka0
Yokohama F. Marinos0Winner
1X 72%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
· FT
Cerezo Osaka0Yokohama F. Marinos0Winner
1X 72%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Full Time
146%
X26%
228%
Team Goals Over/Under
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 24% | 76% | 56% | 44% |
 | 37% | 63% | 71% | 29% |
Goals Over/Under
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FT | 50% | 50% | 62% | 38% |
Correct Score
1-1
12.2%
1-0
10.5%
2-1
9.5%
0-1
7.9%
2-0
7.8%
0-0
7.1%
1-2
6.9%
Avispa Fukuoka2
Fagiano Okayama1Winner
X2 65%
BTTS*
Yes 54%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
· FT
Avispa Fukuoka2Fagiano Okayama1Winner
X2 65%
BTTS*
Yes 54%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Tokyo3
Urawa Reds0Winner
1 50%
BTTS*
Yes 60%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 59%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 54%
· FT
Tokyo3Urawa Reds0Winner
1 50%
BTTS*
Yes 60%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 59%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 54%
Kyoto Sanga0
Machida Zelvia1Winner
X2 72%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
· FT
Kyoto Sanga0Machida Zelvia1Winner
X2 72%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
JEF United–
V-Varen Nagasaki–Winner
1X 73%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
JEF United–V-Varen Nagasaki–Winner
1X 73%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Tokyo Verdy–
Sanfrecce Hiroshima–Winner
2 58%
BTTS*
No 53%
Correct Score
0-1 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 63%
Tokyo Verdy–Sanfrecce Hiroshima–Winner
2 58%
BTTS*
No 53%
Correct Score
0-1 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 63%
Mito Hollyhock–
Shimizu S-Pulse–Winner
X2 67%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 64%
Mito Hollyhock–Shimizu S-Pulse–Winner
X2 67%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 64%
Kawasaki Frontale–
Nagoya Grampus–Winner
1 52%
BTTS*
Yes 56%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 56%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 57%
Kawasaki Frontale–Nagoya Grampus–Winner
1 52%
BTTS*
Yes 56%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 56%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 57%
Shimizu S-Pulse–
Gamba Osaka–Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Shimizu S-Pulse–Gamba Osaka–Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Sanfrecce Hiroshima–Kyoto Sanga–Winner
1 68%
BTTS*
Yes 51%
Correct Score
2-0 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 58%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 55%
Sanfrecce Hiroshima–Kyoto Sanga–Winner
1 68%
BTTS*
Yes 51%
Correct Score
2-0 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 58%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 55%
Tokyo Verdy–Tokyo–Winner
2 59%
BTTS*
No 60%
Correct Score
0-1 16%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 59%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 69%
Tokyo Verdy–Tokyo–Winner
2 59%
BTTS*
No 60%
Correct Score
0-1 16%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 59%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 69%
JEF United–Yokohama F. Marinos–Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 52%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
JEF United–Yokohama F. Marinos–Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 52%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Cerezo Osaka–Kawasaki Frontale–Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 53%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 64%
Cerezo Osaka–Kawasaki Frontale–Winner
12 74%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 53%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 64%
Kashima Antlers–V-Varen Nagasaki–Winner
1 71%
BTTS*
No 55%
Correct Score
2-0 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 54%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 59%
Kashima Antlers–V-Varen Nagasaki–Winner
1 71%
BTTS*
No 55%
Correct Score
2-0 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 54%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 59%
Mito Hollyhock–Urawa Reds–Winner
X2 70%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 52%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Mito Hollyhock–Urawa Reds–Winner
X2 70%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 52%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Kashiwa Reysol–Nagoya Grampus–Winner
1 55%
BTTS*
Yes 57%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 57%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Kashiwa Reysol–Nagoya Grampus–Winner
1 55%
BTTS*
Yes 57%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 57%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Fagiano Okayama–
Vissel Kobe–Winner
X2 65%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Fagiano Okayama–Vissel Kobe–Winner
X2 65%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 50%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Machida Zelvia–Avispa Fukuoka–Winner
1 50%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 63%
Machida Zelvia–Avispa Fukuoka–Winner
1 50%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 63%
V-Varen Nagasaki–Sanfrecce Hiroshima–Winner
2 53%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
0-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
V-Varen Nagasaki–Sanfrecce Hiroshima–Winner
2 53%
BTTS*
Yes 52%
Correct Score
0-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Avispa Fukuoka–Gamba Osaka–Winner
X2 66%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Avispa Fukuoka–Gamba Osaka–Winner
X2 66%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 62%
Fagiano Okayama–Mito Hollyhock–Winner
1X 69%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 64%
Fagiano Okayama–Mito Hollyhock–Winner
1X 69%
BTTS*
Yes 53%
Correct Score
1-1 13%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 51%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 64%
Kyoto Sanga–Kashima Antlers–Winner
X2 68%
BTTS*
Yes 61%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 58%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 55%
Kyoto Sanga–Kashima Antlers–Winner
X2 68%
BTTS*
Yes 61%
Correct Score
1-1 11%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 58%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 55%
Nagoya Grampus–Cerezo Osaka–Winner
1X 69%
BTTS*
Yes 56%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 52%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Nagoya Grampus–Cerezo Osaka–Winner
1X 69%
BTTS*
Yes 56%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 52%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 61%
Shimizu S-Pulse–Machida Zelvia–Winner
X2 73%
BTTS*
No 52%
Correct Score
1-1 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 58%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 69%
Shimizu S-Pulse–Machida Zelvia–Winner
X2 73%
BTTS*
No 52%
Correct Score
1-1 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 58%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 69%
Yokohama F. Marinos–Tokyo Verdy–Winner
1X 72%
BTTS*
No 56%
Correct Score
1-0 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 62%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 72%
Yokohama F. Marinos–Tokyo Verdy–Winner
1X 72%
BTTS*
No 56%
Correct Score
1-0 14%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
under 62%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 72%
Kawasaki Frontale–Vissel Kobe–Winner
1X 65%
BTTS*
Yes 59%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 56%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Kawasaki Frontale–Vissel Kobe–Winner
1X 65%
BTTS*
Yes 59%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 56%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Tokyo–Kashiwa Reysol–Winner
1X 68%
BTTS*
Yes 59%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 56%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Tokyo–Kashiwa Reysol–Winner
1X 68%
BTTS*
Yes 59%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 56%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 56%
Urawa Reds–JEF United–Winner
1 54%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 54%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 60%
Urawa Reds–JEF United–Winner
1 54%
BTTS*
Yes 55%
Correct Score
1-1 12%
Over/Under 2.5 goals
over 54%
Over/Under 3.5 goals
under 60%
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score
J-League xG: chances created and allowed
Every J-League team's chances created and allowed a game, measured with our own xG.
How to read it
each logo is a team · tap one for detailseach logo is a team · hover one for detailsJ-League average · 1.41 xG, 1.40 xGAlast 10 games eachTap a logo to see the team's numbers
↑ Fewer chances allowed (xGA a game)
More chances created (xG a game) →
Teams by box· 20
Good attack, good defence
Good attack, weak defence
Weak attack, good defence
Weak attack, weak defence
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
xG is our estimate of how many goals a team's chances were worth, from the shots in each match; xGA is the same for the chances it allowed. The dashed lines are the average of the teams shown. A team close to a line is about average. Teams with fewer than 5 games here aren't in the chart yet.
How we measure →J-League Results vs the Odds
Season 2026/2027 and the last 30 days
How often each result has happened in J-League this season (thick bar) and in the last 30 days (thin bar), next to what the bookmakers’ closing odds expected. The last 30 days cover fewer matches, so their normal range is wider and big swings there are still normal. This is not our prediction accuracy.
How to read it
what the closing odds expectednormal range: chance alone lands here 19 times in 20gap to the odds, in percentage pointsgap outside the normal rangethick bar: Season · thin bar: 30 days
Result · happened
◀ fewer −25◀ fewer than expected · −25 pts odds expected+25 more ▶+25 pts · more than expected ▶
Verdict
Home wins
82 matches
47.6%
Season (82) · 47.6% vs 40.4%
Season
+7.1
±10.1
30 days (22) · 45.5% vs 40.4%
30 days
+5.0
±19.8
Draws
82 matches
20.7%
Season (82) · 20.7% vs 26.9%
Season
−6.1
±9.6
30 days (22) · 18.2% vs 26.6%
30 days
−8.4
±18.4
Away wins
82 matches
31.7%
Season (82) · 31.7% vs 32.7%
Season
−1.0
±9.7
30 days (22) · 36.4% vs 33.0%
30 days
+3.4
±18.9
Over 2.5 goals
82 matches
53.7%
Season (82) · 53.7% vs 49.2%
Season
+4.4
±10.7
30 days (22) · 45.5% vs 50.7%
30 days
−5.2
±20.7
Both teams scored
82 matches
59.8%
Season (82) · 59.8% vs 52.4%
Season
+7.3
±10.8
30 days (22) · 59.1% vs 53.8%
30 days
+5.3
±20.8
Show more markets (6)Show fewer markets
Over 3.5 goals
82 matches
34.1%
Season (82) · 34.1% vs 27.8%
Season
+6.3
±9.6
30 days (22) · 27.3% vs 29.2%
30 days
−1.9
±18.8
Home side ahead at half-time
82 matches
37.8%
Season (82) · 37.8% vs 30.9%
Season
+6.9
±9.8
30 days (22) · 40.9% vs 31.4%
30 days
+9.5
±19.1
Level at half-time
82 matches
43.9%
Season (82) · 43.9% vs 42.4%
Season
+1.5
±10.7
30 days (22) · 45.5% vs 41.8%
30 days
+3.6
±20.6
Away side ahead at half-time
82 matches
18.3%
Season (82) · 18.3% vs 26.7%
Season
−8.4
±9.4
30 days (22) · 13.6% vs 26.8%
30 days
−13.2
±18.2
Home team scored 2+
82 matches
50.0%
Season (82) · 50.0% vs 40.0%
Season
+10.0
±10.3
30 days (22) · 50.0% vs 41.6%
30 days
+8.4
±20.1
Away team scored 2+
82 matches
36.6%
Season (82) · 36.6% vs 35.3%
Season
+1.2
±10.1
30 days (22) · 31.8% vs 36.9%
30 days
−5.1
±19.6
Shows what happened, not what comes next. Closing odds from one bookmaker per match, bookmaker margin removed. Updated daily.
Show as a tableHide the table
| Result | Period | Matches | Happened | Odds expected | Gap (pts) | Normal range (± pts) | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Home wins | Season | 82 | 47.6% | 40.4% | +7.1 | ±10.1 | Normal range |
| Home wins | 30 days | 22 | 45.5% | 40.4% | +5.0 | ±19.8 | Normal range |
| Draws | Season | 82 | 20.7% | 26.9% | −6.1 | ±9.6 | Normal range |
| Draws | 30 days | 22 | 18.2% | 26.6% | −8.4 | ±18.4 | Normal range |
| Away wins | Season | 82 | 31.7% | 32.7% | −1.0 | ±9.7 | Normal range |
| Away wins | 30 days | 22 | 36.4% | 33.0% | +3.4 | ±18.9 | Normal range |
| Over 2.5 goals | Season | 82 | 53.7% | 49.2% | +4.4 | ±10.7 | Normal range |
| Over 2.5 goals | 30 days | 22 | 45.5% | 50.7% | −5.2 | ±20.7 | Normal range |
| Both teams scored | Season | 82 | 59.8% | 52.4% | +7.3 | ±10.8 | Normal range |
| Both teams scored | 30 days | 22 | 59.1% | 53.8% | +5.3 | ±20.8 | Normal range |
| Over 3.5 goals | Season | 82 | 34.1% | 27.8% | +6.3 | ±9.6 | Normal range |
| Over 3.5 goals | 30 days | 22 | 27.3% | 29.2% | −1.9 | ±18.8 | Normal range |
| Home side ahead at half-time | Season | 82 | 37.8% | 30.9% | +6.9 | ±9.8 | Normal range |
| Home side ahead at half-time | 30 days | 22 | 40.9% | 31.4% | +9.5 | ±19.1 | Normal range |
| Level at half-time | Season | 82 | 43.9% | 42.4% | +1.5 | ±10.7 | Normal range |
| Level at half-time | 30 days | 22 | 45.5% | 41.8% | +3.6 | ±20.6 | Normal range |
| Away side ahead at half-time | Season | 82 | 18.3% | 26.7% | −8.4 | ±9.4 | Normal range |
| Away side ahead at half-time | 30 days | 22 | 13.6% | 26.8% | −13.2 | ±18.2 | Normal range |
| Home team scored 2+ | Season | 82 | 50.0% | 40.0% | +10.0 | ±10.3 | Normal range |
| Home team scored 2+ | 30 days | 22 | 50.0% | 41.6% | +8.4 | ±20.1 | Normal range |
| Away team scored 2+ | Season | 82 | 36.6% | 35.3% | +1.2 | ±10.1 | Normal range |
| Away team scored 2+ | 30 days | 22 | 31.8% | 36.9% | −5.1 | ±19.6 | Normal range |
J-League luck check: the last 10 games
J-League teams taking more or fewer points than their chances usually bring, measured with our own xG.
How to read it
what their chances usually bringnormal range (±4)outside it+6.7 = 7 points more than their chances usually bringRiding their luck3
- Kashiwa ReysolClinical · +6 goals+6.7
- Yokohama F. MarinosClinical · +6 goals+6.1
Machida ZelviaClinical · +9 goals+4.6
Unlucky2
Avispa FukuokaWasteful · −3 goals−7.7
Nagoya GrampusWasteful · −6 goals−4.4
Points in line, but wasteful: Shimizu S-Pulse (−6 goals), Cerezo Osaka (−5), Gamba Osaka (−4), Tokyo Verdy (−3). Clinical: Urawa Reds (+6), Kashima Antlers (+3).
In line with their chances: Vissel Kobe, Kyoto Sanga, Tokyo, Mito Hollyhock, Fagiano Okayama, V-Varen Nagasaki, Kawasaki Frontale, JEF United and Sanfrecce Hiroshima.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
For each of a team's last 10 games, we work out how many points a team usually gets from a game with those chances (xG) for and against, add them up and compare with the points it actually got. We do the same for goals. Strong teams often get a bit more than their chances suggest, so we compare each team with sides of similar strength in this league. That way nobody is flagged just for being good.
We flag a team when the gap is 4 points or more (or 3 goals or more). If some games have no xG data, we use the ones that do.
Does it mean anything? 85% of teams 4+ points ahead of their chances got fewer points in their next 10 games, and 83% of teams 4+ points behind got more. Bookmakers already expect these gaps to even out, so it's a fan's read, not a betting edge.
How we measure →J-League last week: smash-and-grab wins and upsets
Smash-and-grab wins (the side with clearly fewer chances won) and upsets (results the closing odds gave under 20%) from the last 7 days.
How to read it
Oct 3–Oct 10 · 6 matches · odds: closing, margin removedNo smash-and-grab wins or upsets in these 6 matches.
Calculated by MyGameOdds · xG: our own model
How it works
Smash-and-grab: the winner had at least 0.8 less xG than the loser (our xG, from shots). Upset: the result the closing odds gave under 20%, with the bookmaker margin removed. Across our leagues about 6% of matches are smash-and-grab wins and about 5% are upsets.
How we measure →J-League Standings
Check the current league table, team positions, points, and form. Click to view complete standings with detailed statistics.
#TEAM | MP | PTS | W | D | L | G | GD | FORM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1  Kashiwa Reysol | 9 | 21 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 21:14 | +7 | W W W L L |
2  Machida Zelvia | 9 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 22:10 | +12 | W L D W W |
3  Tokyo | 9 | 20 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 17:8 | +9 | W W W W D |
4  Vissel Kobe | 9 | 19 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 14:9 | +5 | L W W W W |
5  Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 8 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 20:6 | +14 | W W L W D |
AFC Champions League
AFC Champions League Qualifiers
Relegation
MP=Matches Played
PTS=Points
W=Wins
D=Draws
L=Losses
G=Goals (For:Against)
GD=Goal Difference
FORM=Last 5 Matches
About J-League
The league profile compares J-League with the 63 leagues and cups we rank over the last 12 months (rank 1 = highest). The stats that stand out pick the most unusual numbers from each team's last 10 games. The attack vs defence chart puts each team in one of four boxes: top right creates more and allows fewer chances than the league average. The luck check shows who got more or fewer points than their chances in the last 10 games, and Last week lists wins with fewer chances and results the bookmakers gave under 20%.
These statistics represent prediction accuracy based on the last 100 matches in the league. Accuracy reflects how often the model correctly predicted the outcome for each market. Our football predictions are generated using advanced AI techniques combined with historical match data, team form, player availability, tactical trends, and head-to-head records to deliver reliable forecasts. Explore our prediction results tracker for live accuracy across all completed matches, our league accuracy data for competition-level breakdowns, or prediction performance for team-level insights.
The J1 League is Japan’s top-tier football competition, known for its technical precision, disciplined tactics, and fast-paced gameplay. With 20 teams operating under a promotion and relegation system, the league has gained increasing global recognition. Historically dominated by clubs like Kashima Antlers and Yokohama F. Marinos, the J1 League continues to grow in competitiveness, attracting international talent and expanding its fanbase. Renowned for its innovative football approach and passionate supporters, the J1 League is a must-watch for football enthusiasts worldwide.