Super League China Predictions & Stats
The Chinese Super League is the top professional football league in China. It consists of 16 teams and operates on a system of promotion and relegation. The Chinese Super League is known for its high-profile signings and ambitious clubs. Guangzhou Evergrande Taobao FC is the most successful club in Chinese Super League history.
Super League Predictions by Market
Season 2026 · Round 8 · Regular Season
Full-Time Result
53.8%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
44% Implied Probability
+22.3% Strongly above implied probability
Both Teams To Score
57.5%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
54.1% Implied Probability
+6.3% Above implied probability
Over/Under 2.5 Goals
62.5%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
53.6% Implied Probability
+16.6% Strongly above implied probability
Over/Under 3.5 Goals
67.5%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
61.4% Implied Probability
+9.9% Above implied probability
First Half Result
40%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
38.2% Implied Probability
+4.7% Above implied probability
Correct Score
9%
SUCCESS RATE AVG.
Our AI model analyzes Super League matches across 6 betting markets — Full-Time Result, Both Teams To Score, Over/Under 2.5 Goals, Over/Under 3.5 Goals, First Half Result, Correct Score. Each card above compares our prediction accuracy against the implied probability derived from bookmaker odds (shown as the dashed line). Green bars mean the model outperforms bookmaker expectations; red means the bookmakers currently hold a sharper edge. Across all markets, our model outperforms bookmaker baselines in 5 out of 5 markets this season. Correct Score predictions for Super League currently hit at 9%.
Full-Time Result is our strongest Super League betting market this season with 54% prediction accuracy — that's 22.3% above the bookmaker-implied probability of 44%. This means our AI model correctly predicts Full-Time Result outcomes at a significantly higher rate than what bookmaker odds suggest, making it a prime market for finding value bets in Super League.
The remaining markets — Both Teams To Score, Over/Under 2.5 Goals, Over/Under 3.5 Goals — perform near or above bookmaker expectations, offering moderate edges for data-driven Super League football tips.
Today's Betting Tips for Super League China
| 1 | 59% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 20% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 16% | 84% | 42% | 58% |
| Hangzhou | 43% | 57% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 53% | 47% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 10.0% | 9.2% | 9.1% | 6.6% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 59% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 20% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16% | 84% | 42% | 58% | |
| 43% | 57% | 75% | 25% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 41% | 59% | 53% | 47% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 10.0% | 9.2% | 9.1% | 6.6% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 59% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 20% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Guoan | 15% | 85% | 41% | 59% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 43% | 57% | 74% | 26% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 51% | 49% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.8% | 9.5% | 8.8% | 8.6% | 6.5% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 59% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 20% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15% | 85% | 41% | 59% | |
| 43% | 57% | 74% | 26% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 39% | 61% | 51% | 49% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 | 3-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.8% | 9.5% | 8.8% | 8.6% | 6.5% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 58% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Port | 17% | 83% | 44% | 56% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 43% | 57% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 55% | 45% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.2% | 10.1% | 9.6% | 9.0% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 58% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17% | 83% | 44% | 56% | |
| 43% | 57% | 75% | 25% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 55% | 45% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.2% | 10.1% | 9.6% | 9.0% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 28% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 48% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 35% | 65% | 68% | 32% |
| Shandong Taishan | 22% | 78% | 51% | 49% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 9.8% | 8.7% | 7.3% | 6.8% | 6.7% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 28% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 48% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35% | 65% | 68% | 32% | |
| 22% | 78% | 51% | 49% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 0-2 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 9.8% | 8.7% | 7.3% | 6.8% | 6.7% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 60% | |
| X | 22% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chongqing Tonglianglong FC | 18% | 82% | 48% | 52% |
| Qingdao Youth Island | 49% | 51% | 81% | 19% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 51% | 49% | 63% | 37% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 3-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.4% | 11.3% | 10.7% | 10.2% | 7.1% | 6.7% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 60% | |
| X | 22% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18% | 82% | 48% | 52% | |
| 49% | 51% | 81% | 19% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 51% | 49% | 63% | 37% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 3-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.4% | 11.3% | 10.7% | 10.2% | 7.1% | 6.7% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 37% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 39% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sichuan | 29% | 71% | 59% | 41% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 28% | 72% | 59% | 42% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.9% | 8.4% | 8.0% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 37% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 39% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29% | 71% | 59% | 41% | |
| 28% | 72% | 59% | 42% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.9% | 8.4% | 8.0% | 7.8% | 7.5% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 53% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 23% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalian Zhixing | 19% | 81% | 48% | 52% |
| Yunnan Yukun | 39% | 61% | 72% | 28% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.0% | 10.1% | 9.9% | 8.6% |
| 1 | 53% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 23% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19% | 81% | 48% | 52% | |
| 39% | 61% | 72% | 28% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.0% | 10.1% | 9.9% | 8.6% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan Songshan Longmen | 24% | 76% | 54% | 46% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 29% | 71% | 60% | 40% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 53% | 47% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.7% | 8.8% | 8.1% | 7.5% | 6.7% | 6.4% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 35% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24% | 76% | 54% | 46% | |
| 29% | 71% | 60% | 40% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 53% | 47% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 2-2 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.7% | 8.8% | 8.1% | 7.5% | 6.7% | 6.4% | 6.0% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 31% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalian Zhixing | 27% | 73% | 59% | 41% |
| Chongqing Tonglianglong FC | 35% | 65% | 69% | 31% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 51% | 49% | 62% | 38% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.5% | 10.3% | 8.7% | 8.5% | 7.8% | 7.2% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 31% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27% | 73% | 59% | 41% | |
| 35% | 65% | 69% | 31% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 51% | 49% | 62% | 38% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.5% | 10.3% | 8.7% | 8.5% | 7.8% | 7.2% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 27% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan Songshan Longmen | 22% | 78% | 52% | 48% |
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 37% | 63% | 70% | 30% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 59% | 41% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.1% | 9.8% | 9.7% | 8.2% | 7.0% | 6.6% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 27% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22% | 78% | 52% | 48% | |
| 37% | 63% | 70% | 30% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 59% | 41% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.1% | 9.8% | 9.7% | 8.2% | 7.0% | 6.6% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 61% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shandong Taishan | 16% | 84% | 42% | 58% |
| Qingdao Youth Island | 47% | 53% | 79% | 21% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 10.0% | 10.0% | 9.5% | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 61% | |
| X | 21% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16% | 84% | 42% | 58% | |
| 47% | 53% | 79% | 21% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.6% | 10.0% | 10.0% | 9.5% | 6.6% | 6.5% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 25% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 25% | 75% | 58% | 42% |
| Wuhan Three Towns | 41% | 59% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 56% | 44% | 67% | 33% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.8% | 12.3% | 9.4% | 9.1% | 8.8% | 8.4% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 25% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 75% | 58% | 42% | |
| 41% | 59% | 75% | 25% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 56% | 44% | 67% | 33% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.8% | 12.3% | 9.4% | 9.1% | 8.8% | 8.4% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 52% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 24% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 19% | 81% | 49% | 51% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 39% | 61% | 72% | 28% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.0% | 10.4% | 9.8% | 8.3% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 52% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 24% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19% | 81% | 49% | 51% | |
| 39% | 61% | 72% | 28% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 45% | 55% | 57% | 43% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.0% | 10.4% | 9.8% | 8.3% | 6.2% | 6.1% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 35% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 40% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 32% | 68% | 64% | 36% |
| Shanghai Port | 27% | 73% | 60% | 40% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.9% | 9.5% | 8.7% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 35% | |
| X | 26% | |
| 2 | 40% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32% | 68% | 64% | 36% | |
| 27% | 73% | 60% | 40% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.9% | 9.5% | 8.7% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 6.9% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 60% | |
| X | 22% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hangzhou | 16% | 84% | 43% | 57% |
| Sichuan | 46% | 54% | 78% | 22% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 10.1% | 10.1% | 9.6% | 6.9% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 60% | |
| X | 22% | |
| 2 | 18% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16% | 84% | 43% | 57% | |
| 46% | 54% | 78% | 22% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 43% | 57% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1% | 10.1% | 10.1% | 9.6% | 6.9% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 34% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yunnan Yukun | 25% | 75% | 56% | 44% |
| Beijing Guoan | 30% | 70% | 61% | 39% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.8% | 8.9% | 8.1% | 7.9% | 6.9% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 34% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25% | 75% | 56% | 44% | |
| 30% | 70% | 61% | 39% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 55% | 45% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.8% | 8.9% | 8.1% | 7.9% | 6.9% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 47% | |
| X | 28% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Youth Island | 26% | 74% | 60% | 40% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 41% | 59% | 75% | 25% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 57% | 43% | 68% | 32% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.1% | 12.7% | 9.6% | 9.0% | 8.9% | 8.8% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 47% | |
| X | 28% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26% | 74% | 60% | 40% | |
| 41% | 59% | 75% | 25% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 57% | 43% | 68% | 32% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.1% | 12.7% | 9.6% | 9.0% | 8.9% | 8.8% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 37% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 37% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liaoning Tieren FC | 29% | 71% | 62% | 38% |
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 29% | 71% | 62% | 38% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 48% | 52% | 60% | 40% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.4% | 8.8% | 8.7% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 6.8% |
| 1 | 37% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 37% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29% | 71% | 62% | 38% | |
| 29% | 71% | 62% | 38% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 48% | 52% | 60% | 40% |
| 1-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.4% | 8.8% | 8.7% | 8.3% | 8.3% | 6.8% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shandong Taishan | 20% | 80% | 48% | 52% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 33% | 67% | 64% | 36% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 38% | 62% | 50% | 50% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.2% | 9.3% | 7.5% | 7.2% | 6.7% | 6.4% |
| 1 | 48% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20% | 80% | 48% | 52% | |
| 33% | 67% | 64% | 36% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 38% | 62% | 50% | 50% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.2% | 9.3% | 7.5% | 7.2% | 6.7% | 6.4% |
| 1 | 54% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chongqing Tonglianglong FC | 20% | 80% | 52% | 48% |
| Henan Songshan Longmen | 44% | 56% | 78% | 22% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 53% | 47% | 65% | 35% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.0% | 11.8% | 10.4% | 10.2% | 7.6% | 7.2% |
| 1 | 54% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 21% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20% | 80% | 52% | 48% | |
| 44% | 56% | 78% | 22% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 53% | 47% | 65% | 35% |
| 1-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.0% | 11.8% | 10.4% | 10.2% | 7.6% | 7.2% |
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 22% | 78% | 53% | 47% |
| Qingdao Hainiu | 39% | 61% | 71% | 29% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 11.0% | 9.7% | 8.6% | 7.0% | 7.0% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22% | 78% | 53% | 47% | |
| 39% | 61% | 71% | 29% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.3% | 11.0% | 9.7% | 8.6% | 7.0% | 7.0% | 6.7% |
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 27% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing Guoan | 20% | 80% | 49% | 51% |
| Dalian Zhixing | 35% | 65% | 67% | 33% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 53% | 47% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.4% | 9.5% | 8.3% | 7.0% | 6.9% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 27% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20% | 80% | 49% | 51% | |
| 35% | 65% | 67% | 33% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 53% | 47% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 | 2-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.4% | 9.5% | 8.3% | 7.0% | 6.9% | 6.1% |
| 1 | 58% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 22% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Port | 16% | 84% | 41% | 59% |
| Sichuan | 42% | 58% | 72% | 28% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 37% | 63% | 50% | 50% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.0% | 9.1% | 8.4% | 8.3% | 6.6% |
| 1 | 58% | |
| X | 20% | |
| 2 | 22% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 16% | 84% | 41% | 59% | |
| 42% | 58% | 72% | 28% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 37% | 63% | 50% | 50% |
| 2-1 | 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.0% | 9.1% | 8.4% | 8.3% | 6.6% |
| 1 | 47% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 30% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yunnan Yukun | 22% | 78% | 52% | 48% |
| Hangzhou | 34% | 66% | 65% | 35% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.8% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 7.2% | 7.0% | 6.4% |
| 1 | 47% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 30% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22% | 78% | 52% | 48% | |
| 34% | 66% | 65% | 35% | |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 42% | 58% | 54% | 46% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-0 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.8% | 9.2% | 8.3% | 7.2% | 7.0% | 6.4% |
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score
Super League Prediction Accuracy by Team
The stats below break down our AI prediction accuracy for every Super League betting market at the team level. For each market, we rank the teams where our model performs best — for example, Sichuan leads Full-Time Result predictions with 86% accuracy (6 correct out of 7 picks). The prediction form streaks show which teams our model has been getting right recently — a run of consecutive correct predictions (shown as green dots) suggests the model has a strong read on that team's current patterns. Teams on a hot streak in a high-edge market like Full-Time Result are especially worth watching for your next Super League bet.
The form table at the bottom highlights Super League teams in the best current match-day form based on recent results — useful for identifying in-form sides that may offer additional betting value.
Super League Full-Time Result Predictions Accuracy
Top Predicted Teams
Prediction Form Streaks
Super League Both Teams To Score Predictions Accuracy
Top Predicted Teams
Prediction Form Streaks
Super League Over/Under 2.5 Goals Predictions Accuracy
Top Predicted Teams
Prediction Form Streaks
Super League Over/Under 3.5 Goals Predictions Accuracy
Top Predicted Teams
Prediction Form Streaks
Super League First Half Result Predictions Accuracy
Top Predicted Teams
Prediction Form Streaks
Super League Teams in Best Form
Super League China Standings
Check the current league table, team positions, points, and form. Click to view complete standings with detailed statistics.
#TEAM | MP | PTS | W | D | L | G | GD | FORM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 8 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 23:7 | +16 | W W W W W |
2 | 7 | 17 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 11:5 | +6 | W W W W D |
3 | 7 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13:11 | +2 | W W W W W |
4 | 7 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 14:13 | +1 | L L W L W |
5 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 16:8 | +8 | W W W W D |