Super League China Predictions and Betting Tips
The Chinese Super League is the top professional football league in China. It consists of 16 teams and operates on a system of promotion and relegation. The Chinese Super League is known for its high-profile signings and ambitious clubs. Guangzhou Evergrande Taobao FC is the most successful club in Chinese Super League history.
In the Super League 2025 season, the full time [1,X,2] prediction accuracy stands at 51%, calculated based on the AI model's performance over the last 100 matches of the league. Both Teams To Score (BTTS) accuracy is at 66%. Correct Score prediction accuracy is 14%. Over/Under 2.5 goals prediction accuracy is 58%, while Over/Under 3.5 goals prediction accuracy is 59%.
These figures represent the hit ratio: the number of times the AI model predicts the right outcome over the last 100 matches of the league. The closer to 100%, the better the model's performance. Leveraging advanced machine-learning techniques and historical data, our AI model accurately predicts the outcomes of future football matches, considering various factors such as team form, player injuries, head-to-head records, and more.
Betting Tips for Super League China
| 1 | 43% | |
| X | 28% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dalian Zhixing | 26% | 74% | 59% | 41% |
| Beijing Guoan | 35% | 65% | 70% | 30% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 52% | 48% | 64% | 36% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.9% | 10.7% | 9.2% | 8.4% | 8.0% | 7.3% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 43% | |
| X | 28% | |
| 2 | 29% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 26% | 74% | 59% | 41% |
 | 35% | 65% | 70% | 30% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 52% | 48% | 64% | 36% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 2-0 | 1-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.9% | 10.7% | 9.2% | 8.4% | 8.0% | 7.3% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Henan Songshan Longmen | 21% | 79% | 52% | 48% |
| Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 37% | 63% | 70% | 30% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 58% | 42% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.7% | 10.1% | 9.6% | 8.0% | 6.6% | 6.5% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 49% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 26% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 21% | 79% | 52% | 48% |
 | 37% | 63% | 70% | 30% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 46% | 54% | 58% | 42% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 2-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.7% | 10.1% | 9.6% | 8.0% | 6.6% | 6.5% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 34% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 43% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wuhan Three Towns | 29% | 71% | 59% | 41% |
| Shanghai Port | 23% | 77% | 51% | 49% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 36% | 64% | 48% | 52% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.2% | 8.8% | 7.6% | 6.8% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 34% | |
| X | 23% | |
| 2 | 43% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 29% | 71% | 59% | 41% |
 | 23% | 77% | 51% | 49% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 36% | 64% | 48% | 52% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 2-2 | 0-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.2% | 8.8% | 7.6% | 6.8% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 32% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Hainiu | 27% | 73% | 60% | 40% |
| Changchun Yatai | 34% | 66% | 68% | 32% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 51% | 49% | 62% | 38% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.6% | 10.5% | 8.7% | 8.5% | 7.4% | 7.3% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 27% | |
| 2 | 32% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 27% | 73% | 60% | 40% |
 | 34% | 66% | 68% | 32% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 51% | 49% | 62% | 38% |
| 1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12.6% | 10.5% | 8.7% | 8.5% | 7.4% | 7.3% | 7.0% |
| 1 | 66% | |
| X | 19% | |
| 2 | 15% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chengdu Rongcheng | 12% | 88% | 37% | 63% |
| Hangzhou | 49% | 51% | 80% | 20% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 52% | 48% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.4% | 10.3% | 10.2% | 9.1% | 7.4% | 7.3% |
| 1 | 66% | |
| X | 19% | |
| 2 | 15% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 12% | 88% | 37% | 63% |
 | 49% | 51% | 80% | 20% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 40% | 60% | 52% | 48% |
| 1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 3-1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.4% | 10.3% | 10.2% | 9.1% | 7.4% | 7.3% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 34% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yunnan Yukun | 26% | 74% | 56% | 44% |
| Shandong Taishan | 32% | 68% | 64% | 36% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.9% | 8.4% | 8.4% | 7.6% | 7.4% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 42% | |
| X | 24% | |
| 2 | 34% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 26% | 74% | 56% | 44% |
 | 32% | 68% | 64% | 36% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 2-0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.9% | 8.4% | 8.4% | 7.6% | 7.4% | 6.3% |
| 1 | 34% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 42% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Meizhou Hakka | 31% | 69% | 63% | 37% |
| Shanghai Shenhua | 25% | 75% | 56% | 44% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.5% | 8.6% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 7.5% | 6.2% |
| 1 | 34% | |
| X | 25% | |
| 2 | 42% |
| <0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 | 31% | 69% | 63% | 37% |
 | 25% | 75% | 56% | 44% |
| <2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
| FT | 44% | 56% | 56% | 44% |
| 1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 0-2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11.5% | 8.6% | 8.2% | 7.9% | 7.5% | 6.2% |
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score