Super League China Predictions and Betting Tips
The Chinese Super League is the top professional football league in China. It consists of 16 teams and operates on a system of promotion and relegation. The Chinese Super League is known for its high-profile signings and ambitious clubs. Guangzhou Evergrande Taobao FC is the most successful club in Chinese Super League history.
In the Super League 2025 season, the full time [1,X,2] prediction accuracy stands at 55%, calculated based on the AI model's performance over the last 100 matches of the league. Both Teams To Score (BTTS) accuracy is at 53%. Correct Score prediction accuracy is 9%. Over/Under 2.5 goals prediction accuracy is 58%, while Over/Under 3.5 goals prediction accuracy is 58%.
These figures represent the hit ratio: the number of times the AI model predicts the right outcome over the last 100 matches of the league. The closer to 100%, the better the model's performance. Leveraging advanced machine-learning techniques and historical data, our AI model accurately predicts the outcomes of future football matches, considering various factors such as team form, player injuries, head-to-head records, and more.
Betting Tips for Super League China
1 | 35% | |
X | 25% | |
2 | 41% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Qingdao Youth Island | 31% | 69% | 63% | 37% |
Shanghai Port | 27% | 73% | 57% | 43% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 44% | 56% | 56% | 44% |
1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.9% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 7.6% | 6.1% |
1 | 35% | |
X | 25% | |
2 | 41% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 31% | 69% | 63% | 37% |
![]() | 27% | 73% | 57% | 43% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 44% | 56% | 56% | 44% |
1-1 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
10.9% | 8.4% | 8.1% | 8.0% | 7.6% | 6.1% |
1 | 39% | |
X | 25% | |
2 | 36% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Wuhan Three Towns | 27% | 73% | 58% | 42% |
Hangzhou | 28% | 72% | 60% | 40% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 44% | 56% | 55% | 45% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.5% | 8.1% | 8.1% | 8.1% | 7.4% | 6.4% |
1 | 39% | |
X | 25% | |
2 | 36% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 27% | 73% | 58% | 42% |
![]() | 28% | 72% | 60% | 40% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 44% | 56% | 55% | 45% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 2-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.5% | 8.1% | 8.1% | 8.1% | 7.4% | 6.4% |
1 | 32% | |
X | 26% | |
2 | 42% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sichuan | 34% | 66% | 68% | 33% |
Yunnan Yukun | 27% | 73% | 60% | 40% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 50% | 50% | 63% | 37% |
1-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.1% | 10.2% | 8.6% | 8.5% | 7.8% | 7.4% | 7.0% |
1 | 32% | |
X | 26% | |
2 | 42% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 34% | 66% | 68% | 33% |
![]() | 27% | 73% | 60% | 40% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 50% | 50% | 63% | 37% |
1-1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 1-2 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-2 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.1% | 10.2% | 8.6% | 8.5% | 7.8% | 7.4% | 7.0% |
1 | 58% | |
X | 24% | |
2 | 18% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Dalian Zhixing | 19% | 81% | 49% | 51% |
Changchun Yatai | 49% | 51% | 81% | 19% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 52% | 48% | 63% | 37% |
1-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 3-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.3% | 10.9% | 10.5% | 9.7% | 8.0% | 6.3% | 6.3% |
1 | 58% | |
X | 24% | |
2 | 18% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 19% | 81% | 49% | 51% |
![]() | 49% | 51% | 81% | 19% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 52% | 48% | 63% | 37% |
1-0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 0-0 | 0-1 | 3-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13.3% | 10.9% | 10.5% | 9.7% | 8.0% | 6.3% | 6.3% |
1 | 66% | |
X | 21% | |
2 | 13% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tianjin Jinmen Tiger | 15% | 85% | 43% | 57% |
Qingdao Hainiu | 56% | 44% | 86% | 14% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 50% | 50% | 62% | 38% |
1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
14.1% | 12.4% | 9.8% | 9.3% | 8.3% | 7.6% |
1 | 66% | |
X | 21% | |
2 | 13% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 15% | 85% | 43% | 57% |
![]() | 56% | 44% | 86% | 14% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 50% | 50% | 62% | 38% |
1-0 | 2-0 | 2-1 | 1-1 | 3-0 | 0-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
14.1% | 12.4% | 9.8% | 9.3% | 8.3% | 7.6% |
1 | 39% | |
X | 25% | |
2 | 36% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Henan Songshan Longmen | 28% | 72% | 60% | 40% |
Shanghai Shenhua | 30% | 70% | 62% | 38% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 46% | 54% | 57% | 43% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.4% | 9.1% | 8.3% | 7.7% | 7.4% | 6.6% | 6.0% |
1 | 39% | |
X | 25% | |
2 | 36% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 28% | 72% | 60% | 40% |
![]() | 30% | 70% | 62% | 38% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 46% | 54% | 57% | 43% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.4% | 9.1% | 8.3% | 7.7% | 7.4% | 6.6% | 6.0% |
1 | 40% | |
X | 27% | |
2 | 33% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Meizhou Hakka | 27% | 73% | 60% | 40% |
Shandong Taishan | 31% | 69% | 65% | 35% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.6% | 9.4% | 8.7% | 8.2% | 7.7% | 6.9% | 6.4% |
1 | 40% | |
X | 27% | |
2 | 33% |
<0.5 | >0.5 | <1.5 | >1.5 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() | 27% | 73% | 60% | 40% |
![]() | 31% | 69% | 65% | 35% |
<2.5 | >2.5 | <3.5 | >3.5 | |
FT | 49% | 51% | 61% | 39% |
1-1 | 1-0 | 2-1 | 0-1 | 1-2 | 0-0 | 2-0 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.6% | 9.4% | 8.7% | 8.2% | 7.7% | 6.9% | 6.4% |
*Probability of each predicted outcome is expressed in percentage (%)
*BTTS - Both teams to score